Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. They're the FBI. They're not used to people exercising their rights.
The 2 FBI people I've known, both had law degrees..
Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
61–70 of 84 posts
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#62The Shadow Brokers are still active online. https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkNetMarkets/comments/57le5u/thes... However nothing in the message proves that it was written recently.
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#63It seems like contractors are a massive attack surface for the DoD. I do wonder why they gave a clearance to someone who was apparently a hoarder. If collecting things that interest you in a compulsory manner doesn't suggest to you that this person might be abused by foreign powers, but marijuana use does, your secrets will flow like water.
The key difference to the government is hording can be perfectly legal while marijuana use requires you to participate in the black market.
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
not where I work. Also, random could mean once every 10 years. I use a laptop and take it home every night. Unless they banned users from taking everything with them (phones keychains etc) there's not much a random search would accomplish.
I know people who worked at places where taking a phone into work with a camera in was verboten. And for high security places why on earth would they allow people to work on laptops that are taken home every night an obvious security risk.
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#65Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an outsider looking in, it seems like there have been a lot of DLEs due to contractors though. Theres the obvious example of Snowden, but also the QinetiQ breach ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-01/china-cyb... ). Moonlit Maze might be a counterexample.
I think that's because most of the people doing the work are contractors. Not because of some notion of contractors being less secure/loyal/honest/organized than gov employees. For one federal organization I work for literally everyone I work with and talk to at all levels seems to be a contractor except for a couple people. the ratio is at least 20:1 contractors to federal employees. As for why this is, it's mostly…
There are just so many of them that it projects the attack surface of the DoD out; now you can attack contractors which aren't as tightly regulated, and they might hire people to, say, build their website that aren't even cleared. So now I can steal some web dev's credentials and pivot towards classified networks.
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#67It seems like contractors are a massive attack surface for the DoD. I do wonder why they gave a clearance to someone who was apparently a hoarder. If collecting things that interest you in a compulsory manner doesn't suggest to you that this person might be abused by foreign powers, but marijuana use does, your secrets will flow like water.
collecting things that interest you in a compulsory manner vs marijuana use The key difference to the government is hording can be perfectly legal while marijuana use requires you to participate in the black market.
Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#68Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#69Re: Trove of Stolen Data Is Said to Include Top-Secret U.S. Hacking Tools
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
So does James Comey and he's a complete idiot.
That extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. Can I assume you are also a lawyer?
Comey continues to advocate for backdoors in order to stop ISIS from being able to radicalize marginalized people within the US without them being able to listen. However, there are two obvious problems with this.
1. Why don't you just reach out to the marginalized yourself? Spend that $1M you paid to break into an iPhone on combatting Islamphobia and ISIS will have a tougher job.
2. What is to stop ISIS from using software written outside the US, or software they write themselves, or versions of software older than the mandated backdoors, or open-source software, or... on and on and on. His plan transparently will not work. To quote Schneier, "His problem isn't encryption, it's general purpose computers and a global market for software."
That is stupid.