Live data from Hacker News

Shame on Y Combinator

marco.org

101–110 of 1001 posts

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#101
As a non-US outsider:

Would there be such a ruckus if this was about some other VC fund that bore more right-wing cultural flavors and they had a markable member who donated vast sums of money to the democrat nominee?

A rational person would not discriminate against someone because they do not support the same football club. I fail to see how this is any different.

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#102
In the 21th century educated techies should understand that Trump is not a mere candidate, but a product of a set of image makers, speech writers, psychologists and whole bunch of deceptive and manipulative techniques applied.

Basically, it is a well crafted frontman (same as in a rock band) to appeal to less educated majority. This explains all the sexism and masculinity, bravado and jokes - all this reflects what the majority of any given population would appreciate, but not necessarily publicly approve.

In a society which is famous for its well crafted, researched in psychology departments, deceptive advertising techniques, all what Trump does should be familiar and transparent - the same primitive manipulations everyone is using to sell the crap to each other.

Trump is a product of applied psychology, designed to obtain majority of votes. Do not even try to fancy that hipsters, vegans, etc. leave alone the ivvy league students, constitutes the majority of US population.

So, some people take their chances, betting on that this primitive but sound strategy could win. Consider this as just a form of a risky investment.

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#103
post #65

It puzzles me how come in USA people are considering only 2 candidates to chose from. At this stage it looks like people are not voting for the candidate they agree with, they are choosing the candidate they disagree with the most and then voting for the other one. This is only 1 step better than how it used to be in USSR where people had an option to chose essentially only 1 party. (sure officially there were more p…

I heard an interesting idea which would be to place always a "none of the above" option on the ballot for any position, and in the event that option took majority, all candidates listed would be disqualified completely, and new ballot would need to be made.

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#104
post #54

Why do people need to drag their personal opinions into business matters? Demanding someone gets fire/removed just because they have a different political opinion than you is ridiculous.

Thiel's support of Trump shows that Thiel is a sexist and a racist. If YC wants to attract startups with founders who aren't white men, this is a problem. If startups in YC want to attract employees who aren't white men, this is a problem.

Yeah! He probably hates gays too!

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#106

Why do people need to drag their personal opinions into business matters? Demanding someone gets fire/removed just because they have a different political opinion than you is ridiculous.

In this case those personal opinions are widely publicised, and reflect -- rightly or wrongly -- on Y Combinator. At that point it does become a matter of business, as the backlash may end up hurting Y Combinator's business (negative press, founders not applying, investors not willing to work with it, etc.).

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#107
post #77
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People flag it. I just did. Not sure whether the HN admins have anything to do with it.

Flagged is one thing, a previous discussion was additionally set as "dead". As far as I know that can only be done by an admin, no? If it was all an automatic thing done by the system, then I have no issue with it. BTW, it looks like they turned off the flagged state of this post and are giving the discussion a chance. Well done. Let's hope the comments here don't devolve into silly political bashing...

Enough flags turn it dead. Mods not required.

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#108

From these discussions, are we to take it that YC will not invest in founders who support Trump?

YC seems to be sticking with Thiel, so founders should be safe regardless of their views. As it probably should be.

I would hope that YC already avoids founders who act like Trump though.

Re: Shame on Y Combinator

#109
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not an admin, just a user, but read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. There's nothing very interesting in vilifying Thiel.

On the contrary, the fact that we had, and continue to have numerous threads, and thousands of comments means it is very interesting to the community.

The fact that it keeps getting flagged to death shows something too.
Post reply on HN