Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, instead of assuming a vast conspiracy, you could use regular ol' common sense. On the one hand we have an email dump that, while there seems to be some amount of smoke, doesn't itself represent much of a fire. Just the usual Clinton crap: lots of shady stuff that rides the line of ethics, and veers pretty far into a inside political baseball. On the other, we have a wildly controversial presidential candida…
> On the one hand we have an email dump that, while there seems to be some amount of smoke, doesn't itself represent much of a fire. Just the usual Clinton crap: lots of shady stuff that rides the line of ethics, and veers pretty far into a inside political baseball. You do not seem to be very familiar with them. > On the other, we have a wildly controversial presidential candidate caught talking about sexually assau…
> the only way it can refer to sexual assault is if
> you willfully omit the last part of the quote ("
> they let you do it.")
If I leave dog poop on your doorstep and you don't do anything to me, I could say that you let me do it. That doesn't mean I didn't do anything wrong.
You don't have to call the cops for it to be sexual assault. You don't even have to physically resist. If someone kisses you or touches you in a sexual way without your permission then it's sexual assault. It's that simple.