C2 wiki closed for remodeling
1–10 of 70 posts
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#2Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#3I love the C2 wiki and learned a lot from it. This seems a bit incoherent though. What's actually going on? None of it makes any sense.
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#4I love the C2 wiki and learned a lot from it. This seems a bit incoherent though. What's actually going on? None of it makes any sense.
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#5Federated wiki is a cool idea and all, but I don't want to have to build my own wiki of everything, or decide what concepts should be included in my own wiki. The whole strength of wiki to me is that it massively multiplayer user curated content, where the whole state is determined by everyone working together. I don't know what happens to that curation if there's no authoritative source -- it seems like federated wiki isn't really wiki at all, and is something else entirely.
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#6 So why close? It gives me room to work. The continuous
scraping bumps up against my web throttling making all
other web services useless. Even shell is painfully
slow.
Of course I live in a world of many options. I could be
stalled just reviewing choices. Instead I build on
what I've learned from federated wiki so as to preserve
the original wiki in a form that can be appreciated for
what it has been and will ever be. If you want to help.
Learn some federated wiki. Then email me.Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#7I love the C2 wiki and learned a lot from it. This seems a bit incoherent though. What's actually going on? None of it makes any sense.
Why? I don't see any problem, the message seems quite clear; wikis (similar to forums) are hard to maintain (spam, server load & costs); new inventions are hard to promote (federated wiki mentioned in the post); and maintenance work on hobby projects is gruesome and taxing (thus any chance at getting some leeway by any means available is invaluable).
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#8I was afraid that they'd get taken in by this federated wiki nonsense; I fear we might have lost one of the greats to second system syndrome. Federated wiki is a cool idea and all, but I don't want to have to build my own wiki of everything, or decide what concepts should be included in my own wiki. The whole strength of wiki to me is that it massively multiplayer user curated content, where the whole state is determ…
In the fedwiki model, you would join a neighborhood of people you trust to write good content. fedwiki has a chicken and egg problem right now - there are no good neighborhoods to join.
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#9>
> Federation supports what Cunningham has described as "a chorus of voices" where users share content but maintain their individual perspectives.[3] This approach contrasts with the tendency of centralized wikis such as Wikipedia to function as consensus engines.[4]
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallest_Federated_Wiki
In short I guess if I disagree with a page instead of editing it and starting an edit-war I can fork it.
Re: C2 wiki closed for remodeling
#10I was afraid that they'd get taken in by this federated wiki nonsense; I fear we might have lost one of the greats to second system syndrome. Federated wiki is a cool idea and all, but I don't want to have to build my own wiki of everything, or decide what concepts should be included in my own wiki. The whole strength of wiki to me is that it massively multiplayer user curated content, where the whole state is determ…
> I don't want to have to build my own wiki for everything In the fedwiki model, you would join a neighborhood of people you trust to write good content. fedwiki has a chicken and egg problem right now - there are no good neighborhoods to join.