No. My suggestion would be to find one of the groups already working in this field, get involved with them, and learn the ropes first, before starting your own group.
You have no activism experience. You likely have no organization experience in activism. It reads like your economics training focused on the needs of capital, and not of labor. What do you know of labor history in the US? What are the other groups working on this topc? Eg, I see the AFL-CIO is against on-call scheduling, and http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-on-call-scheduling-201... from 2016 says:
> A coalition of advocates launched a national campaign Tuesday to press large retailers, restaurant chains and other companies to end on-call and last-minute scheduling, which allows companies to assign shifts to workers with only a few hours' notice.
How aligned are you with their positions, what are your differences, and why should your group get funding instead of theirs?
That NYT article from 3 years ago says "Legislators and activists are now promoting proposals and laws to mitigate the scheduling problems", and concerns California. Have those laws gone into place? Do you think the right solution is to improve the laws? Or better enforcement of the laws already present?
Is on call scheduling your only focus? Or primary focus? How does it tie in with wage theft, calls to raise the minimum wage, and other labor issues?
Suppose someone says that on-call scheduling promotes job growth. What principles do you use to judge the balance between the desires of those who control capital and those who labor, and decide we should do something which might lead to less job growth but a better home life?