Live data from Hacker News

Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

cloudrail.com

21–30 of 82 posts

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#21

I'm struggling to understand why. It has a very poor business model, security issues and the storage for the price just doesn't add up. Google Drive or iCloud are far easier to set up, cheaper, and has oodles more space.

How is a poor business model related to market share ?

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#22

I'm struggling to understand why. It has a very poor business model, security issues and the storage for the price just doesn't add up. Google Drive or iCloud are far easier to set up, cheaper, and has oodles more space.

Dropbox is currently indispensable for iOS users. Most iOS people I know use Dropbox as the clunky-but-works app-to-app sharing mechanism. Dropbox is not as popular on Android because apps can integrate more naturally.

iCloud may be easier and is the probable successor, but Apple has only recently gotten its cloud game together and its free option is only 5GB.

Eventually the platforms are going to make using a third party obsolete (arguably already so on Android) so I predict we're at peak Dropbox usage. Especially considering Google's new Pixel phones will store all photos at full resolution for free, I'm sure Apple will at least have to increase their free storage tier.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#23
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand your comparison. iCloud is only $0.99 for the 50GB option. I have over 300GB (and growing) worth of pictures and videos that I've been collecting since my first kid was born 6 years ago. It would be $9.99 on iCloud just as it is on Dropbox. Even cheaper on Dropbox, actually, because I buy by the year (and full disclosure, I get 2TB for the price of 1TB because I'm a long term customer, but I only u…

if you dont care about the best usability, and you dont collaborate, Amazon Cloud Drive is 60/year for unlimited storage. not that youll hit 2tb soon, but for someone looking for cheap and easy cloud storage, dropbox is kind of expensive. you pay for the featureset not the storage size.

And if you're only storing still images, Amazon Cloud Drive has a $12/year plan (or, an exact clone of the same tier included with Prime right now) for unlimited photo storage, which is practically a steal if you take a lot of pictures and not a lot of video.

It's cheap enough that I can use it as a cloud copy or a second cloud copy, and I never have to worry about losing photos again.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#24
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand your comparison. iCloud is only $0.99 for the 50GB option. I have over 300GB (and growing) worth of pictures and videos that I've been collecting since my first kid was born 6 years ago. It would be $9.99 on iCloud just as it is on Dropbox. Even cheaper on Dropbox, actually, because I buy by the year (and full disclosure, I get 2TB for the price of 1TB because I'm a long term customer, but I only u…

if you dont care about the best usability, and you dont collaborate, Amazon Cloud Drive is 60/year for unlimited storage. not that youll hit 2tb soon, but for someone looking for cheap and easy cloud storage, dropbox is kind of expensive. you pay for the featureset not the storage size.

Amazon Cloud drive is great for the price (I use it) but they also have filesize limits (anything over 5GB seems to simply error out without warning), so I end up RARing my larger drive backups. Also the software backing it is severely lacking, besides the auto-upload of photos from my iPhone.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#25

I'm struggling to understand why. It has a very poor business model, security issues and the storage for the price just doesn't add up. Google Drive or iCloud are far easier to set up, cheaper, and has oodles more space.

Dropbox is currently indispensable for iOS users. Most iOS people I know use Dropbox as the clunky-but-works app-to-app sharing mechanism. Dropbox is not as popular on Android because apps can integrate more naturally. iCloud may be easier and is the probable successor, but Apple has only recently gotten its cloud game together and its free option is only 5GB. Eventually the platforms are going to make using a third…

I'm confused by your comment... I'm a recent convert to iOS from Windows Phone, and I've just kept on using OneDrive for my documents. I'm not even sure what "app-to-app sharing" means. Dropbox definitely isn't indispensable to me.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#26

I really don't understand Dropbox. For the average user that wants to store, say, a few tens of GBs Dropbox costs $9.99 a month. Nevermind it gives 1TB total, most people don't need that much. iCloud, for example, costs $0.99/month. That's an _order of magnitude_ more expensive. Whichever way you slice it, it seems like Dropbox's core user base, that pays but doesn't take full advantage of the 1TB is bank-rolling the…

I don't understand your comparison. iCloud is only $0.99 for the 50GB option. I have over 300GB (and growing) worth of pictures and videos that I've been collecting since my first kid was born 6 years ago. It would be $9.99 on iCloud just as it is on Dropbox. Even cheaper on Dropbox, actually, because I buy by the year (and full disclosure, I get 2TB for the price of 1TB because I'm a long term customer, but I only u…

Storing those photos and videos on Google Photos [0] would be free though. Just last week I migrated my photos away from iCloud and to Google Photos, since I don't really want to spend money for storage. And I got sick of the notification in Mac OS X to upgrade my iCloud storage.

For people who value privacy a lot, maybe Google Photos might not be a nice option. I should note that one can choose whether to share photos with other people or not on Google Photos.

---

[0]: https://photos.google.com

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#27
post #6
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't claim to represent the average app developer but I've never so much as heard of CloudRail, them claiming to be a "Unified API integration leader" and all. I can't find them being written about by someone like Gartner; some other sources claim that they're a European startup in the IoT integration space. I guess I'm not sure what to make of some unknown-to-me company's study on usage of its own SDK for cloud s…

I've heard of them before a couple times but frankly, I don't know how good the source is. Just considered it interesting and I'm a Dropbox only user as well.

I'm a "use all the free space I can get from whichever provider" user. Across the providers I use I have 207.25 GB of storage.Dropbox, Drive, Box, and OneDrive all integrate with Astro file manager on my phone. Media Fire and AT&T Locker thru only their own apps. Astro may or may not use cloud rail internally to abstract away the apis for each different server. Although Astro does not offer egnyte so probably not.

That doesn't include Amazon's unlimited free storage for photos with our family prime account.

Oh, and a 1 TB Western Digital personal cloud drive...

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#28
post #21

I'm struggling to understand why. It has a very poor business model, security issues and the storage for the price just doesn't add up. Google Drive or iCloud are far easier to set up, cheaper, and has oodles more space.

How is a poor business model related to market share ?

That's a good question/point and suggests a lack of education of its users of alternatives which are cheaper/better/more reliable.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#29

I'm struggling to understand why. It has a very poor business model, security issues and the storage for the price just doesn't add up. Google Drive or iCloud are far easier to set up, cheaper, and has oodles more space.

Dropbox tends to sync more reliably than other services. This isn't something that affects every user. But a sync solution that doesn't work well enough for you despite being cheaper, easier to setup, space etc, isn't that useful.

Dropbox is the only service (I know of) that supports Linux. While it may not affect you directly, it does affect who you can interoperate with. For example in a startup with developers using Linux, you'll need something that works for them too.

Re: Dropbox Owns Cloud Storage on Mobile

#30
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand your comparison. iCloud is only $0.99 for the 50GB option. I have over 300GB (and growing) worth of pictures and videos that I've been collecting since my first kid was born 6 years ago. It would be $9.99 on iCloud just as it is on Dropbox. Even cheaper on Dropbox, actually, because I buy by the year (and full disclosure, I get 2TB for the price of 1TB because I'm a long term customer, but I only u…

Storing those photos and videos on Google Photos [0] would be free though. Just last week I migrated my photos away from iCloud and to Google Photos, since I don't really want to spend money for storage. And I got sick of the notification in Mac OS X to upgrade my iCloud storage. For people who value privacy a lot, maybe Google Photos might not be a nice option. I should note that one can choose whether to share phot…

Google Photos storage is unlimited at a reduced/optimized resolution. If you want to maintain the original raw resolution, it uses your Google Drive Storage for that. If you decide to get a Google Pixel phone, they give you the unlimited raw format storage.
Post reply on HN