It kind of irks me that they basically assume a cubic lattice. Nature does not form cubic lattices, when nature forms a lattice (for example, in a foam) it tends to form roughly dodecahedral cells (with coordination number 12). Given this property, a space-time lattice would be very nearly isotropic.
Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
11–20 of 178 posts
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#12If we're living in a simulation, the question of whether AIs can have consciousness is solved.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#13It kind of irks me that they basically assume a cubic lattice. Nature does not form cubic lattices, when nature forms a lattice (for example, in a foam) it tends to form roughly dodecahedral cells (with coordination number 12). Given this property, a space-time lattice would be very nearly isotropic.
It kind of irks me that they basically assume 3+1- space-time.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#14If we're living in a simulation, the question of whether AIs can have consciousness is solved.
I suppose you can point at all the artificial simulants and their sentience, but as pointed out in a sibling comment, so what.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#15If we're living in a simulation, the question of whether AIs can have consciousness is solved.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#16If someone does find out, you can simply fix the problem and revert to a point in time just before the data leading to the discovery was captured.
Speaking academically, you might be playing with fire if you probe the outer limits of the universe and we are in a simulation run by some entity concerned with keeping that a secret.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#17What sort of moral issues result from creating a simulation universe that gives rise to sentient beings? I feel creeped out and reminded of Source Code with Jake Gyllenhaal for some reason.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#18It kind of irks me that they basically assume a cubic lattice. Nature does not form cubic lattices, when nature forms a lattice (for example, in a foam) it tends to form roughly dodecahedral cells (with coordination number 12). Given this property, a space-time lattice would be very nearly isotropic.
While you're largely right, salt disagrees.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#19What sort of moral issues result from creating a simulation universe that gives rise to sentient beings? I feel creeped out and reminded of Source Code with Jake Gyllenhaal for some reason.
Re: Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012)
#20If we're living in a simulation, the question of whether AIs can have consciousness is solved.