Live data from Hacker News

A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

arxiv.org

91–100 of 155 posts

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

/pol/:/sg/ helped the Russian airforce identify rebels positions in Syria and destroy them. It is not all bullshit at all; there is a significant proportion of it that is undeniably childish garbage but there is the occasional gem as well.

source? if true, this would be a troubling precedent in the use of third party analysis in conducting military operations

https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/4deu8r/pol_helps_coo...

Can't find a better source. But this was the second time RuAF bombed the rebles camp after third party analysis (might be a coincidence ofc). There was a different image with Russian MoD's report on the matter.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

/pol/:/sg/ helped the Russian airforce identify rebels positions in Syria and destroy them. It is not all bullshit at all; there is a significant proportion of it that is undeniably childish garbage but there is the occasional gem as well.

source? if true, this would be a troubling precedent in the use of third party analysis in conducting military operations

Not sure how much of this, if any, has been corroborated, but this [1] is a description of the events.

[1] http://www.vocativ.com/326039/how-one-4chan-board-is-trying-...

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#93

I've been really surprised how influential /pol/ has been this election, which has been really weird and a little scary. It's not uncommon to post something on 4chan stating that you have inside information on events that are going to happen over the next few days (which is fiction 99.9% of the time). Posts like this in /pol/ have been getting screenshotted and spread elsewhere on the web, where alt-right conspiracy…

/pol/ uncovered the Paul Combetta posts on Reddit. So it's not all bullshit. Its crazy that they had enough of an effect to get the head of the FBI grilled by a house committee.

That's part of the frustration for me - 0.1% of the time they uncover something of real value that no one else noticed. It's just that 99.9% of the time it's just noise, memes and conspiracy theories. I guess that's why people keep coming back to the forum.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#94
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's really not pronounced "lay-tecks"? Damn, I've been pronouncing that incorrectly for years, then.

LaTeX: /ˈlɑːtɛx/ LAH-tekh, also pronounced as /ˈlɑːtɛk/ LAH-tek or /ˈleɪtɛk/ LAY-tek

Knuth, in his book, memorably decreed a pronunciation (and case mixing in the written form) for TeX, with a hard /ch/ at the end (literally, "your monitor should become slightly moist"), backed by a clever and erudite rationale involving the etymology of words like technique.

Leslie Lamport, in his book on LaTeX, decreed a case mixing, but (as you say) ok'd any reasonable pronunciation.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#95
post #27

It really looks like wasted money, if it was really financed and is not an elaborate trolling.

I think the money was totally worth it, just for the fun we all had. It's a lot of people having fun. Although maybe the people who don't know about this (thus couldn't have fun) shouldn't have paid for it :\

So was it really financed from the tax money of Europeans? If it was, I am really sad. Then the authors shouldn't be proud of such an "achievement."

If it was generated by the 4chan regulars with their own money, then at least it's not worth discussing it more here...

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

/g/ makes useful software on occasion for example. after 4chan pioneered webm as looping gif replacement (long before imgur doing the gifv thing) they made webmcam and webm4retards for example. The latter by its mere existence also highlighted github's overzealous application of community policies. A bunch of indie games started their life there too. And then there are derivative and mashup works like fanart, transla…

But we could apply the reverse Sturgeon's law: in any sufficiently large community, 1% of content will not be crap. 4chan is not special, it's just large.

But it's size together with the temporary aspect of it's content greatly accelerates the iteration process, culling bad content and refining the good one.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

/pol/:/sg/ helped the Russian airforce identify rebels positions in Syria and destroy them. It is not all bullshit at all; there is a significant proportion of it that is undeniably childish garbage but there is the occasional gem as well.

source? if true, this would be a troubling precedent in the use of third party analysis in conducting military operations

I occasionally lurk on 4chan (in particular /sg/ since they aggregate lots of data regarding the Syrian civil war) and I witnessed this one particular event first hand. Now I understand that this is not a verifiable source but I found this as well, that sums-up the whole thing: http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan+pol+sg+orders+an+air...

I don't think you will be able to find anything better than that to "prove" it happened.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#98
post #71
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Have you tried reading the paper? There is actually interesting data and analysis in there.

Yes I have read the paper. It seems like a lot of pandering to 4chan and /pol/. It's a clear example of an effort troll for the lulz. > recent events have brought the discussion board site 4chan to the forefront of the world’s collective mind Err, try polling even the American population and see how many know about the existence of 4chan. It is NOT at the forefront of the world's collective mind. > Even though 4chan…

[deleted]

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#99
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seeing "LaTeX" (lay-tech) and "arXiv" together in your sentence made me finally realize that arXiv is pronounced "archive". I've been reading it as "arx-iv" for years.

It's really not pronounced "lay-tecks"? Damn, I've been pronouncing that incorrectly for years, then.

I guess we're in the same boat on that one. It's a weird pronunciation, though, so it barely counts against us. ;)

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#100

I've been really surprised how influential /pol/ has been this election, which has been really weird and a little scary. It's not uncommon to post something on 4chan stating that you have inside information on events that are going to happen over the next few days (which is fiction 99.9% of the time). Posts like this in /pol/ have been getting screenshotted and spread elsewhere on the web, where alt-right conspiracy…

Indeed a couple of posts made in the last few months have been prescient of serious and highly secretive information. The motivation behind such posters is likely explained below.

I think what a lot of people don't get about /pol/'s influence in the last year is it's mechanism. It is easy to browse the site as an outsider and think it is just shitposting 9000, with no real influence outside. However /pol/ unconsciously and without formal direction has an extremely effective strategy for disseminating information.

Once the essence of some information has been distilled users start disseminating it to the 'normies' via Reddit and Twitter. Twitter is where the real influence comes as they inevitably target journalists in large numbers. As most know, journalists and politicians are extremely engaged in Twitter. Stories frequently then cross the barrier into the mainstream.

Targeting of journalists and politicians, largely but not always via Twitter, is where most of the huge power is derived. People targeted don't necessarily have the internet experience to realise when these things are directed. A lot of what most of them see is a flurry of regular public concern which needs to be addressed.

When a story from /pol/ reaches the mainstream, it goes into a glorious frenzy. It is a powerful feeling when something you have created/discovered and disseminated in a 4chan thread becomes international news because of the boards collective action.

Summarised: when a very large group of people with political leanings on a story/topic informally organise, the effort can take the view mainstream. important to note is the demographic includes a diverse group of users who are highly skilled in programming, social media and politics.

edit: If I was a highly placed politician and wanted to disseminate secret information without attribution, I would run it through the tumbler that is 4chan.

Post reply on HN