Live data from Hacker News

The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

nobelprize.org

171–180 of 362 posts

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That MusiCares speech is a great read if you have 30 minutes to spare. A few favorite bits: On Dylan's immersion in classic folk: >If you sang "John Henry" as many times as me – "John Henry was a steel-driving man / Died with a hammer in his hand / John Henry said a man ain't nothin' but a man / Before I let that steam drill drive me down / I'll die with that hammer in my hand." If you had sung that song as many time…

The MusicCares speech is great; thanks. An interesting excerpt: I learned lyrics and how to write them from listening to folk songs. And I played them, and I met other people that played them, back when nobody was doing it. Sang nothing but these folk songs, and they gave me the code for everything that's fair game, that everything belongs to everyone. Does Dylan allow bootlegging? Are his songs libre? Does he limit…

I think hes talking mostly about the folk song tradition. If you look in both blues/folk there are a lot of songs that are very similar, with almost interchangeable lyrics by many different artists.

The song Little Sadie is one example - its been known under a variety of names, with variations of lyrics. All the John Henry songs - they have been sung by blues and country players alike for almost a century.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#172

Totally 100% well deserved. Just imagine the 13 year old out there discovering "Masters of War" or "Idiot Wind" for the first time today. Their entire point of view is about to change. Mind upon to hitherto unknowable vistas. Ergo, the absolute benchmark of what Great Literature strives to embody. Also worth checking out is Dylan's controversial speech upon receiving the the MusiCares Person of the Year 2015 award. I…

I don't know. I like Dylan's music alright, but reading the lyrics posted here and imagining how they would sound on their own (If you've heard the songs, you tend to impose the music on them when you read them), I don't think they're particularly impressive. If you slipped, say, "The Ballad of a Thin Man" into a poetry anthology I don't believe many people coming across it blind would consider it one of the greats.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#173
post #40
post #5

Come writers and critics Who prophesize with your pen And keep your eyes wide The chance won't come again And don't speak too soon For the wheel's still in spin And there's no tellin' who That it's namin' For the loser now Will be later to win For the times they are a-changin'.

The rebel became part of the institution in the end. Somewhat sad if you ask me.

Reminds me of Jean-Paul Sartre's letter in which he rejected the Nobel Prize:

> The writer who accepts an honour of this kind involves as well as himself the association or institution which has honoured him,” he said at the time. “The writer must therefore refuse to let himself be transformed into an institution, even if this occurs under the most honourable circumstances, as in the present case. (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/05/sartre-nobel-p...)

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#174
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm curious. Should screenplays also be eligible for the nobel in literature?

And should novels be eligible for songwriting awards?

Songwriting clearly doesn't include novels. Literature includes both, and more.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#175
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The MusicCares speech is great; thanks. An interesting excerpt: I learned lyrics and how to write them from listening to folk songs. And I played them, and I met other people that played them, back when nobody was doing it. Sang nothing but these folk songs, and they gave me the code for everything that's fair game, that everything belongs to everyone. Does Dylan allow bootlegging? Are his songs libre? Does he limit…

I think hes talking mostly about the folk song tradition. If you look in both blues/folk there are a lot of songs that are very similar, with almost interchangeable lyrics by many different artists. The song Little Sadie is one example - its been known under a variety of names, with variations of lyrics. All the John Henry songs - they have been sung by blues and country players alike for almost a century.

> I think hes talking mostly about the folk song tradition.

He says he's part of that tradition, and at length talks about how he benefited from it. Does he give back?

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#176

Totally 100% well deserved. Just imagine the 13 year old out there discovering "Masters of War" or "Idiot Wind" for the first time today. Their entire point of view is about to change. Mind upon to hitherto unknowable vistas. Ergo, the absolute benchmark of what Great Literature strives to embody. Also worth checking out is Dylan's controversial speech upon receiving the the MusiCares Person of the Year 2015 award. I…

I don't know. I like Dylan's music alright, but reading the lyrics posted here and imagining how they would sound on their own (If you've heard the songs, you tend to impose the music on them when you read them), I don't think they're particularly impressive. If you slipped, say, "The Ballad of a Thin Man" into a poetry anthology I don't believe many people coming across it blind would consider it one of the greats.

Is it right to consider the lyrics without the music? Isn't that a little like reading a literal translation of a poem in another language?

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#177
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the time since Dylan started signing black people went from having very limited rights to winning a presidential elections. Obviously, there are many more factors than Dylan at play, and establishing causality, or the lack of thereof, is impossible. But, in my opinion, saying that society has not changed would be a big mistake.

Attributing any of that "progress" to Bob Dylan is a huge reach. He has a lot of fans and reached some segment of the population with his act, but he's basically just another guy peddling records and tap dancing for nickels.

This is an unfortunate outlook in my opinion. Art and literature are definitely more important than mere entertainment. The greatness of an artist is determined by how much impact they had on a society.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#178
post #91

It seems that Haruki Murakami is the Leonardo DiCaprio of Nobel prizes.

What is your favorite book by him? I've only read once thus far. "What I talk about when I talk about running"

1Q84 is my favorite, but I wouldn't start with it. Kafka on the Shore or A Wild Sheep Chase are excellent and better starting points.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#179

I love how so many on the thread have Dylan lyrics to contribute. Seems like empirical evidence for his impact. I listened obsessively to every shred of Dylan I could lay my hands on when I was a teenager. With apologies to Bob Dylan... Then she opened up a book of poems And handed it to me Written by an American poet From the twentieth century And everyone of them words rang true And glowed like burnin' coal Pourin'…

This song is my personal favorite :) Thanks for posting.

Re: The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016 awarded to Bob Dylan

#180

It seems that Haruki Murakami is the Leonardo DiCaprio of Nobel prizes.

Unpopular opinion, but they're both overrated. DiCaprio just overacts and people interpret it as a sign of good acting (c.f.: "he cut his hand and kept acting!"; method acting is also given too much credit these days as well) I've read Murakami and it just felt soulless and bland, like he was just appealing to "lonely and lost" people, but not in any meaningful way. Just my personal opinion.

Lastly, if someone keeps getting passed up for an award, it just signifies that there are people who deserved the award more, not that they deserve the award by virtue of not receiving it. That's why I think it's silly that he won the Oscar for The Revenant, which was certainly not his best performance. You can make a case for someone deserving an award for cumulative achivement, but then there are even more worthy candidates.

Post reply on HN