Live data from Hacker News

Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

dumpyahoo.com

31–40 of 102 posts

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#31
post #2

While I agree with the sentiment. Here's why you should not delete your yahoo account. Once you delete your account, yahoo will make it available again to everyone. This means that if you have not unlinked everything it can be used by others to reset accounts on services you forgot that you linked to your yahoo account. Instead of deleting it, forward it all to another account and stop using it. Do not forget to log…

This is an excellent argument for setting up e-mail using your own domain name, though, and for using that for all new accounts and transitioning existing accounts to your new e-mail address as soon as possible. The Internet works just fine when it's decentralised, but particularly with e-mail, relying on the big service providers (or an ISP-provided address, for that matter) immediately locks you into someone else's…

Although that also introduces risks. Losing control over your domain would be problematic. It happens.

The argument for individual domains suggests itself, or an equivalent follows-the-person mechanism.

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#33

This is a great way to sign people up to your mailing list.

This is actually one line of discussion I'd hoped to spark in posting the item.

There are a few dyanmics here:

1. Goodwill for a company with repeated security breeches.

2. Goodwill for a company which rolls over in the face of government surveillance.

3. Privacy expectations in the face of third-party hosted services. Frankly, Yahoo's actions should send stone-cold shivers through anyone using such systems.

4. The whole question of online petitions and such.

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just use Mailinator[1] for that. [1] https://www.mailinator.com/

That's inbound only though, correct? You need another provider for sending.

If it's for something to sign up to get a free bonus or coupon I use "10 Minute Email" https://10minutemail.com/10MinuteMail/index.html?dswid=-8354

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#36

the only thing I ever liked about yahoo is flickr.. I'll miss it if its gone.

Agreed it was the only place where I could find nice pictures of nature especially and the free 1TB storage they gave me. Oh well I guess life goes on

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#37
post #8

Yahoo is simply the first company that we publicly know of that scans incoming emails. If the government can force Yahoo, they will force all of them. Yahoo has more disgruntled former employees to reveal secrets than Google, Microsoft, etc...

To be fair, according to this article, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and others have explicitly denied allowing government officials direct access to their servers. However, due to the secrecy requirements of the law, we cannot know if they did allow the government some other form of access that was functionally equivalent to a rootkit on the server in terms of what the government could access. Pure speculation on my par…

[deleted]

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#38
post #8

Yahoo is simply the first company that we publicly know of that scans incoming emails. If the government can force Yahoo, they will force all of them. Yahoo has more disgruntled former employees to reveal secrets than Google, Microsoft, etc...

To be fair, according to this article, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and others have explicitly denied allowing government officials direct access to their servers. However, due to the secrecy requirements of the law, we cannot know if they did allow the government some other form of access that was functionally equivalent to a rootkit on the server in terms of what the government could access. Pure speculation on my par…

[deleted]

Re: Why We Should All Dump Yahoo

#39
post #8

Yahoo is simply the first company that we publicly know of that scans incoming emails. If the government can force Yahoo, they will force all of them. Yahoo has more disgruntled former employees to reveal secrets than Google, Microsoft, etc...

To be fair, according to this article, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and others have explicitly denied allowing government officials direct access to their servers. However, due to the secrecy requirements of the law, we cannot know if they did allow the government some other form of access that was functionally equivalent to a rootkit on the server in terms of what the government could access. Pure speculation on my par…

> Google, Microsoft, Apple, and others have explicitly denied allowing government officials direct access to their servers.

Yes, of course I will trust them. I am sure that they were paragons of user rights

Post reply on HN