if a person offers two licenses, and you only need to accept one of them to be licensed, then you should be all set. If I sue facebook and they countersue, then my defense is simply "i am licensed under BSD". The fact that you offered an additional license (they even call it "additional") does not mean that I am required to accept it when the first license stands alone. Right?
Facebook React.js License
121–130 of 203 posts
Re: Facebook React.js License
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any talk within Facebook on amending this clause or moving React to a standard license? I believe it's stopping a lot of large companies (whom the patent clause could actually affect) from using React, and all other like-licensed Facebook software.
Just use Polymer, vue or something else without that problem :-)
Re: Facebook React.js License
#123if a person offers two licenses, and you only need to accept one of them to be licensed, then you should be all set. If I sue facebook and they countersue, then my defense is simply "i am licensed under BSD". The fact that you offered an additional license (they even call it "additional") does not mean that I am required to accept it when the first license stands alone. Right?
Yes, but Facebook didn't dual-license this, they licensed it under a modified version of the BSD license. So it's that license or nothing. Edit: good point, gcp.
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/LICENSE
which by admission of the blog post this is about, already includes an implicit patent grant on React.
And he'll pass on this:
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/PATENTS
Which is marked as "additional".
Re: Facebook React.js License
#124Hi, Paul from the React team here. There have been lots of questions about the license+patents combo we use. Recently our legal team answered some of those questions. https://code.facebook.com/license-faq
Is there any talk within Facebook on amending this clause or moving React to a standard license? I believe it's stopping a lot of large companies (whom the patent clause could actually affect) from using React, and all other like-licensed Facebook software.
Re: Facebook React.js License
#125Do people really think Facebook developed and released React for the sole, or even primary purpose of gaining patent rights? It's preposterous that so many top engineers would be working on such a goal.
It seems obvious that Facebook just has some overly cautious lawyers. I highly doubt that means Facebook is going to use your usage of React as an excuse to steal your patents.
Re: Facebook React.js License
#126These conspiracy theories are really getting old. Do people really think Facebook developed and released React for the sole, or even primary purpose of gaining patent rights? It's preposterous that so many top engineers would be working on such a goal. It seems obvious that Facebook just has some overly cautious lawyers. I highly doubt that means Facebook is going to use your usage of React as an excuse to steal your…
Re: Facebook React.js License
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any talk within Facebook on amending this clause or moving React to a standard license? I believe it's stopping a lot of large companies (whom the patent clause could actually affect) from using React, and all other like-licensed Facebook software.
Just use Polymer, vue or something else without that problem :-)
Re: Facebook React.js License
#128If it becomes a problem, you could drop in a react-compatible library pretty quickly. React native might be tougher but still would probably appear if there was a case with a lot of publicity.
So happy https://preactjs.com/ and others are around
Re: Facebook React.js License
#129If companies fear that if they try to enforce their patents they will lose access to significant commercial opportunities as a result of not being able to use projects such as react... ...basically, I welcome it. Patents are harmful. The FSF has, to my knowledge, made no meaningful progress in significant patent reform. If this helps, then bring it on.
Re: Facebook React.js License
#130These conspiracy theories are really getting old. Do people really think Facebook developed and released React for the sole, or even primary purpose of gaining patent rights? It's preposterous that so many top engineers would be working on such a goal. It seems obvious that Facebook just has some overly cautious lawyers. I highly doubt that means Facebook is going to use your usage of React as an excuse to steal your…