Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually think it would be a great idea to explicitly start a company that only wanted to hire immigrants especially Syrian refugees: - they're more motivated (they have people lives depending on them making money and sending it back, they actually want to move here rather than just being born here) - they're often richer (i.e. they don't come to live off the state) than those that stay in their own country as they…
You ignore the most important characteristic of these refugees.
The Effect of State Marijuana Legalizations
271–274 of 274 posts
Re: The Effect of State Marijuana Legalizations
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just to nitpick, I shouldn't be allowed to smoke a cigar around a campfire on BLM land?
Actually, in that scenario, the campfire is more likely to be a health threat to asthmatic members of the public (about 7% in the U.S.) than the cigar!
Re: The Effect of State Marijuana Legalizations
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because who is saying something colors the merit it brings. And as a healthy skeptic, knowing the direction to look for potential bias _does_ help orient my skepticism and find potential ulterior motives within the infinite space of "all ulterior motives". I certainly was asking myself "I wonder who was backing this" while reading it. (Don't take me the wrong way, I absolutely agree with you with respect to not filte…
> Because who is saying something colors the merit it brings Not at all; this is the "ad hominem" logical fallacy. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem ) The claims being made are objectively true or false entirely independently of any personal attributes of the person making them. In other words, who is saying something is entirely irrelevant to the merit of what they are saying.
Re: The Effect of State Marijuana Legalizations
#274A contrasting report: http://www.rmhidta.org/html/2016%20FINAL%20Legalization%20of... There are indeed significant changes in some marijuana-related statistics. The Cato institute report has selected indicators that are relatively stable and do not show these effects. It does not discuss the limitations of the data, discuss data sources that were considered but not used, or include illustrative anecdotes. It can be s…
Looks like this report deliberately chosen negative stats and use of non zero y axis in some graphs made me cringe as well.