Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

thelastpsychiatrist.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 42 posts

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#21

Post by smallblacksun »

pyre wrote: post #15
rguzman wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't expecting that females to be more likely to listen than males a negative sexual bias?

I think the point GP was trying to make is that this isn't necessarily a case of male professors being nice to women just because they are attracted to them (or assume that they might be attractive) and that there is a possibility of sex. (or something to that effect) It's still 'sexism' if a professor responds better to female students than male students because he perceives female students as being more receptive a…

So it's okay to be sexist if you aren't doing it because you're attracted to the person?

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#23

Post by pyre »

smallblacksun wrote: post #21
pyre wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the point GP was trying to make is that this isn't necessarily a case of male professors being nice to women just because they are attracted to them (or assume that they might be attractive) and that there is a possibility of sex. (or something to that effect) It's still 'sexism' if a professor responds better to female students than male students because he perceives female students as being more receptive a…

So it's okay to be sexist if you aren't doing it because you're attracted to the person?

I'm not saying anything of the sort. The implication that professors are being nice to female students to get sex implies that they are trying to abuse the power of their authority. If they are being nice because they perceive female students as more receptive to/grateful for help, it's a little more benign, no?

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#24

Post by pyre »

growingconcern wrote: post #22

In other interesting news: kids like candy.

Contrary to popular belief though, babies much prefer milk (breast or formula) to candy. So finding a baby with candy to 'take' may prove to be a difficult proposition (for varying definitions of 'baby', I suppose).

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#25

Post by teilo »

smallblacksun wrote: post #21
pyre wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the point GP was trying to make is that this isn't necessarily a case of male professors being nice to women just because they are attracted to them (or assume that they might be attractive) and that there is a possibility of sex. (or something to that effect) It's still 'sexism' if a professor responds better to female students than male students because he perceives female students as being more receptive a…

So it's okay to be sexist if you aren't doing it because you're attracted to the person?

Sexism != reacting to the sexes differently. Men and women are not the same, and therefore they evoke different responses and reactions. This is not sexism.

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#26

Post by wallflower »

jrockway wrote: post #19
jpwagner wrote: post #2

corollary: female strangers get better [any form of communication] response rates from [anybody]

Try it on IRC sometime. You'll find that within seconds, pretending to be a girl is instantly advantageous. Just don't overdo it.

iDog

http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#27

Post by natrius »

teilo wrote: post #25
smallblacksun wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So it's okay to be sexist if you aren't doing it because you're attracted to the person?

Sexism != reacting to the sexes differently. Men and women are not the same, and therefore they evoke different responses and reactions. This is not sexism.

That's exactly what sexism is. It's not always necessarily a bad thing.

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#28

Post by suckafree »

jrockway wrote: post #20
suckafree wrote: post #16

Of course male professors answer females at a higher response rate. Those in the academia world rarely have hot wives. Professors get married later in life (this has to do with them having no lives outside of the lab). They then have to settle for less than what they want so they marry an intelligent woman who is in that 4-6.5 range on a scale from 1-10. And when young melissamiller comes emailing, she serves as a we…

You have broken the record for most unfounded generalizations in one paragraph.

Just because I don't have fancy science to back it up doesn't mean it's not true.

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#29

Post by gaius »

alexgartrell wrote: post #9

So I've TA'ed for a little while now and I think the answer isn't anything fundamental how women are regarded or how man are being biased against. Men rarely, if ever, act as grateful as women when you help them. There's a long list of potential reasons for this, but I've found it nearly universally to be the case. Even though it's not politically correct, you're more likely to help the person who will thank you sinc…

By "act grateful" you mean, she will (deliberately) mimic the signals that she finds you attractive, making you momentarily feel good about yourself. It's the same as when the pretty waitress flirts with you. She flirts with everyone, and gets good tips.

A man will simply say "cheers" and buy you a pint. What do you expect him to do?

Re: Female strangers get better response rates when e-mailing professors

#30

Post by jrockway »

suckafree wrote: post #28
jrockway wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have broken the record for most unfounded generalizations in one paragraph.

Just because I don't have fancy science to back it up doesn't mean it's not true.

So what about the female professors. Did they settle for a 4.5 wife too?
Post reply on HN