Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 95 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#72
I am a little late to the party, but want to address one topic that I didn't see mentioned below.

One answer to your question is "volume", with a related cause of personal incentives.

You're getting those clicks for free and buying ads on branded terms is just cannibalizing your organic results. Now, instead of $500 per day, you want to scale your campaign to $5,000 per day.

How do you do that? Your return will be less efficient as you seek volume, but you need to spend the $5,000 as effectively as you can.

You (or the agency) look better / get paid more when they're able to spend with a better return. It's probably not your department, or your KPI, what the organic SEO is like. So if you cannibalize some conversions from organic in the SEM attempt to spend the budget and raise conversions, you're probably happy, because you're hitting KPIs that matter to you.

It would take a wise leader to recognize what is happening. Even then, they might decide that although the efficiency of the overall SEO/SEM spend is lowered, it provides more volume. If your company is focused on growth, they may prefer volume over efficiency.

It's rational, once you try to see the larger context in which these decisions are made w/in a company. (It also has it's drawbacks)

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#73

This study ( http://searchengineland.com/google-research-even-if-you-rank... ) is a bit old and possibly biased (since sponsored by Google) but when I worked in SEM the experience we had was the same which was the top organic position + the top paid position netted overall more traffic to our site than with just the organic position alone. The other considerations are: 1) Brand SEM terms are cheap - if you own the br…

This reflects the core argument to do this...but the truth is more subtle. Agencies and in house SEM teams are inherently biased to want to spend on brand terms because a) they can attribute more sales to their channel and b) Justify more spend which equals more revenue for most agencies... I am not discounting the validity of the argument to bid on brand terms and I bid on brand terms for most of my clients...but I…

The cannibalization is a bit of a catch-22. If you don't have paid ads on SERPs where you rank high organically, of course all your traffic will come from the organic results. But if you don't take the top paid spot, your competitor can -- and then they're "cannibalizing" your organic results.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#74
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SERIOUSLY???? I have to beg my clients to stop googling themselves!!! In all seriousness, clients obsess about their ads and how it appears way more than the agencies do...They often don't realize that it can hurt their CTR, their quality scores, and pollute the data used to measure results... Google built an ad preview tool for this very reason.

How does it hurt and pollute? New to this.

A big factor in how much you pay for every click is quality score. The likely biggest factor in quality score is your relative click through rate for the position (i.e. Google wants to show the ad that gets clicked more because it makes them more revenue, if you get clicked 10% of the time for a keyword in position 2 and your competitor gets clicked 8% of the time, Google wants to show your ad and even gives you a discount of sorts on the click via higher quality score.)

So, if you google your keywords to see how your ad appears, you have 2 choices. Click on your ad, which will cost you money or dont click and lower your click through rate which can lower your quality score, especially if you do it often.

The issue of polluting data is that now your agency or whoever is managing your SEM sees either a lower click through rate if your dont click or a lower conversion rate if you do click and will make optimization decisions without knowing how many searches were you.

Google has an ad preview tool in Adwords to let you check without impacting your data.

In the greater scheme of things, if its a high volume query, the harm is minimal, but if its a high value term with low search volume (i.e. a big ticket local service) it can really hurt you.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#75
post #8

I attended a talk by Nordstrom's SEO team and one of their findings was people who click on the top ads spend more than people who click on non ads links. They seemed to think the paid search results might align closer to what the buyer was looking for. That being said they were not 100% sure.

people who click on the top ads spend more Probably because they are less web savvy and less aware of the options they have.

I don't see why clicking the ad makes you less web savvy. You're not the one paying for it.

As an alternative, perhaps people who click the top ad are pressed for time, which is often the case with high income individuals.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#76
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He was referring to running broad match keywords by accident...My point was that its reckless to advertise without understanding match types... Google gives you nearly complete control over which terms they show you on using keyword match types and negative keywords...No one should be advertising with Google without understanding this. https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2497836?hl=en

I wish you could try to frame your criticism in a more engaging and friendly way. In my opinion, it's exactly this kind of absolutist reasoning that seems to be killing community and conversation. Of course he and many others can advertise on Google without understanding match types. The point of the service provided by Google is that it's on the whole, significantly easier than "traditional" ad buying. Regardless of…

I somewhat agree with your point about the tone. I will apologize after writing this.

(Edit: Your post has me confused because you start off talking about tone and than you fail to take your own advice about reasonable discourse.)

Your assumptions however are way off...I would never criticize someone for something remotely excusable, but advertising on Google without taking 2 minutes or less to learn something as fundamental as match types is about as reckless as buying a rolex on the streets from a guy on a manhattan street corner and than feeling ripped off...Some things, like match types, fit into the category of reckless despite how easy you want to think running Adwords is.

My frustration is that so many people waste so much money on digital advertising because "they think they can do it themselves."

This specific guy was sharing advice warning people about adwords wasting his money. Adwords didnt waste him a penny, his unwillingness to do less than 2 minutes of preperation or asking a pro led to that...

Even with over a decade experience, I still learn new things about Adwords almost daily...The idea that people think that its simple and they can run it themselves is frustrating, but to not even know about match types, I cant think of any excuse that justifies it short of arrogance and/or laziness.

Adwords is an auction. When my competitors choose to waste money, My costs get driven up. It hurts everyone but Google...so take the 2 seconds to read up on how to do it or dont complain and tell the world it doesnt work.

Or ask me, Im happy to help with basic strategy for free, its in my best interest for my competitors to run advertising that is accountable to a bottom line and thay doesnt compete in irrelevant query auctions.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#77

My experience with Google ads was that it is very easy to accidentally get them to display your ad in this way, without you knowing it. You choose a list of terms you want to show your ad in, but by default Google will also put your ad up in "related" searches. If your company or product is already popular enough, it's likely to end up in the related searches for the terms you chose. This cost me quite a bit of money…

> by default Google will also put your ad up in "related" searches. I don't mean to be harsh, but you shouldn't be spending money on search advertising without taking the 2 minutes to understand match types. There is no default other than showing you very closely related variant matching (i.e. plural to singular)... Yes, if you run broad match keywords and dont use negatives, you run the risk of wasting lots of money…

I apologize for using a harsh tone in my criticism. You are right, if you dont do some preparation and research in advance, you will likely waste money on adwords.

There are great ways to make sure you dont waste money, like using different match types, writing very relevant ads that qualify people so the wrong people wont click and using negative keywords.

Its a good idea to Google, "Adwords beginner (tips, guide, pitfalls, mistakes)" any of these will surface great info. to get you started on the right foot.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#78
post #71
post #16

I'll add one more - analytics. It's the only way to get accurate impression numbers. Which is a useful thing to trend for brand keywords.

What's wrong with impression numbers from Google Search Console? They're free.

Only very limited 3 months of worth data. Everything costs nowadays when it comes to Google. And Facebook.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#79
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does it hurt and pollute? New to this.

A big factor in how much you pay for every click is quality score. The likely biggest factor in quality score is your relative click through rate for the position (i.e. Google wants to show the ad that gets clicked more because it makes them more revenue, if you get clicked 10% of the time for a keyword in position 2 and your competitor gets clicked 8% of the time, Google wants to show your ad and even gives you a di…

Getting it now, thanks. This field is deep.

Re: Ask HN: Why do companies buy ads when they are the top result in search?

#80
post #63
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does it hurt and pollute? New to this.

If you are interacting with your own ads, the data you get at the end (especially if you are low traffic/a small player) will not be representative of reality, as your actions would have hurt/polluted the result.

Got it, thanks.
Post reply on HN