Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can use the nsfw subreddits as a massive dataset for categorizing porn.
Not all of them. gonwild[1] is a just a massive polygon pun subreddit [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/gonwild
Very edgy stuff!
Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
131–140 of 153 posts
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#132I wonder what would happen if we stopped firing people for watching NSFW images. I mean bosses look at NSFW images all the time and it sounds like a shallow reason to fire someone.
Creates a hostile work environment, however.
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#133That's it! That's what I'm looking for.
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would imagine if you're generating then no real people were part of its creation therefore it would be legal. If I remember correctly cartoons of children having sex is not illegal (in the United States as far as I know). Though that then raises the question: when happens when it can be generated so realistically that it looks indistinguishable from the real thing? Would it still be treated like cartoons? How could…
Here in Airstrip One, cartoons of children may be illegal. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/fan-japanese-anime-make...
I've spoken about this many times, and I'll say it again - it's a horrible violation of freedom of speech and expression to not be allowed to possess or create certain drawings.
There is no law that sickens me more than the one that criminalises drawings. It angers me far more than even modern copyright law.
And the worst part is that nobody seems to care about it, even those who are libertarians in the UK who I've met are overcome with repulsion at the type of speech or expression, not caring for the violation of rights.
It's a horrible law backed by no evidence of harm caused, and I think it is truly truly wrong that people ignore it. I am not exaggerating when I say that the principle is a motivating factor for me to leave the UK
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#135Interesting that the photo of two women on the beach is given a higher NSFW rating than the photo of a man on the beach.
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. You would have to have a large training set with these labels but it would be pretty straightforward to train. You would probably want a tagging model not a classifier because there could be multiple objects of interest in the same image. If you get me the training data I could train a model for you pretty quickly.
What's the current ML pet method for multi-label image classification? It seems like you could string together a bunch of individual classifiers e.g. "Scene contains dog", "Scene contains cat", but is there an efficient (and effective) way of doing it in one go? Does it significantly increase the complexity of the network? I would imagine a cat detector would be far simpler than a cat and/or dog detector.
Maybe Image Captioning: http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/densecap/ (recently discussed on HN too)
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Impossible. There is no accurate way to determine age by external appearance. For example a 15 year could look older than an 18 year old.
That doesn't stop law makers from trying. Like the mess over small-breasted porn being banned in Australia in 2010: > While the ACB claims that there is no blanket ban on small breasts as such, women over the age of 18 with small breasts who might look young ARE banned. http://www.inquisitr.com/59633/australian-government-censor-...
Australia doesn't technically have "freedom of speech" as America or other countries may have.
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#138oh silly Americans, its just tits
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tangent: is your blog pure HTML/CSS? I really like the look of it and have been wanting to start something just like yours.
Not OP, but looks like it's built on Jekyll. If you're not familiar, it's a Static Site Generator. It generates static html files from your content (generally markdown files). There are other SSGs, I use Hugo myself ( http://gohugo.io , sample of my blog: http://arianv.com/ ). I like Hugo cause it's probably the fastest SSG (every time you create a post/change content, you're remaking your entire site from scratch. I…
Awesome, I'll check both of them out. Thanks so much!
Re: Open Sourcing a Deep Learning Solution for Detecting NSFW Images
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe today it's legal (or not?) but that's only because generating realistic porn is not possible yet. Does anyone really think that in today's American society so afraid of sex that this would remain legal? Consider the following situation: Imagine we're 200 years into the future and nothing much has changed with respect to attitudes about sex, freedom of speech, technology, etc. All images available 200 years ago…
how could anyone be harmed by you viewing those images? I think the argument is that pedophiles view existing media and it encourages them to do things to real people. The same reason why excessively violent movies are not considered acceptable for children- it's not out of concern for the people in the movies, it's the effect it will have on the person viewing it.
By that logic rape porn should be illegal too. And many movies and video games of realistic violence / gore.
And that may be part of the argument, but I think the official position of the justice department is that each time a child porn image is viewed, additional harm is inflicted upon the victim in the image.