This is just how simple it is.
And the ones that get help are not the ones that need it, which leads to bad results. VCs are not interested in funding poor people, whatever their abilities or vision.
VCs invest in Stanford grads, where 90%+ of the students are from well off backgrounds (look it up). Why? So if something goes wrong they can say to their LPs "It's not my fault, they went to Stanford!"
A young Steve Jobs would have a harder time raising money today than he did in the 70's. And he'd have a harder time than any random person who got into Stanford - where the admissions program is easily gamed by the wealthy and connected and the graduation rate is 95%.
The limited help available is all being directed at the ones that need and utilize it the least.
The upside for poor people is that being poor forces ones to grow as a person. Steve Jobs used to walk across town to eat free food at the hare krishna temple...no wealthy person could ever imagine what deep reservoirs of drive a thousand humbling experiences can create in a person. It's something you would wish for your child despite the pain required.