Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then why don't you drink this glass of 70% orange juice and 30% motor oil, since by your definition it's "simply orange juice". I sure am glad to know about the patent considerations in this simple criticism in this JavaScript, as I've decided not to use React because of them.
You should read @pluma's explanation of the patent grant. I think its purely a misconception that's unfortunately been regularly repeated. > Then why don't you drink this glass of 70% orange juice and 30% motor oil, since by your definition it's "simply orange juice". I think a more proper correlation of your analogy vs OP's argument would be if you held it up and claims "why I won't be putting this motor oil into my…
It's purely a misconception in the same way that 30% motor oil is pure orange juice -- which is to say, it's not a misconception, by my reading. I wonder what my IP laywer would say about it, will post if I decide to ask.
Unless I am looking at the wrong comment, @pluma's explanation is just that it's not a problem as long as you don't sue Facebook. But this is equivalent to saying that as long as you give up your only recourse in the event FB violates your IP, you'll be fine. To me it seems like a mentality that makes sense primarily if a person doesn't ever expect to do anything worth patenting, or doesn't ever plan on patenting for some other reason. Don't sell yourself short.