Live data from Hacker News

First 'three person baby' born using new method

bbc.co.uk

21–30 of 189 posts

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#21

Notably, this prevents transmission of a disease that is "fatal to any baby conceived", which makes this as uncontroversial a case of a "designer baby" as I can imagine. After this, the ethics get much more complicated.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#22

Notably, this prevents transmission of a disease that is "fatal to any baby conceived", which makes this as uncontroversial a case of a "designer baby" as I can imagine. After this, the ethics get much more complicated.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

It occurs to me there aren't any; it's just a postmodern habit to treat every new technological possibility as an ethical problem first.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#23

Notably, this prevents transmission of a disease that is "fatal to any baby conceived", which makes this as uncontroversial a case of a "designer baby" as I can imagine. After this, the ethics get much more complicated.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Those with resources are able to have healthy (perhaps, better) children and those without take their chances?

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

It occurs to me there aren't any; it's just a postmodern habit to treat every new technological possibility as an ethical problem first.

Right, no quandary at all created by the possibility that mistakes and misunderstandings might lead to children with severe medical problems. Short, miserable lifetimes of suffering are a high cost for "improving the species", and they are a real possibility if the approach taken is to just try things that seem worth trying.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#25

Notably, this prevents transmission of a disease that is "fatal to any baby conceived", which makes this as uncontroversial a case of a "designer baby" as I can imagine. After this, the ethics get much more complicated.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Babies that can run, jump, faster and higher, and live longer, and are generally smarter and just more advanced evolved.. It's like some breeds of dogs/monkeys are smarter than others. So will the 'smart' ones think they are better than all the rest of us.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#26
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me there aren't any; it's just a postmodern habit to treat every new technological possibility as an ethical problem first.

Right, no quandary at all created by the possibility that mistakes and misunderstandings might lead to children with severe medical problems. Short, miserable lifetimes of suffering are a high cost for "improving the species", and they are a real possibility if the approach taken is to just try things that seem worth trying.

Similar risks are taken when two native people from different parts of the world have a baby together.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Babies that can run, jump, faster and higher, and live longer, and are generally smarter and just more advanced evolved.. It's like some breeds of dogs/monkeys are smarter than others. So will the 'smart' ones think they are better than all the rest of us.

I have a silly question - if, as observation allows, some existing people are objectively better than others at things we can measure reliably, what is the ethical problem?

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Babies that can run, jump, faster and higher, and live longer, and are generally smarter and just more advanced evolved.. It's like some breeds of dogs/monkeys are smarter than others. So will the 'smart' ones think they are better than all the rest of us.

[deleted]

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

Babies that can run, jump, faster and higher, and live longer, and are generally smarter and just more advanced evolved.. It's like some breeds of dogs/monkeys are smarter than others. So will the 'smart' ones think they are better than all the rest of us.

They will be. :) Nothing wrong with that, it's just evolution.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#30
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It occurs to me: What are the ethical problems with designer babies?

It occurs to me there aren't any; it's just a postmodern habit to treat every new technological possibility as an ethical problem first.

Guess you're not a big sci-fi reader, huh. The ethical ramifications of designer babies is deeply-mined territory.
Post reply on HN