Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
blogs.windows.com
Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
1–10 of 59 posts
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#2(Disclosure: Microsoft is my employer.)
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#3Microsoft's excellent word salad naming engine strikes again! (Disclosure: Microsoft is my employer.)
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#4This is pure speculation on my part; I have no evidence nor any investigation, deep or otherwise.
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#5Then open source the whole thing, not just little parts of it. It has the lowest number of vulnerabilities in the National Vulnerability Database because it has the least number of eyes able to look for them.
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#6"We’re determined to make Microsoft Edge the safest and most secure browser." Then open source the whole thing, not just little parts of it. It has the lowest number of vulnerabilities in the National Vulnerability Database because it has the least number of eyes able to look for them.
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#7Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#8The idea sounds similar to Qubes OS, with the exception that it's transparent to the user and doesn't have to be configured by the end-user.
I presume this kills any of the offline-storage approaches?
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#9Microsoft's excellent word salad naming engine strikes again! (Disclosure: Microsoft is my employer.)
Re: Introducing Windows Defender Application Guard for Microsoft Edge
#10"We’re determined to make Microsoft Edge the safest and most secure browser." Then open source the whole thing, not just little parts of it. It has the lowest number of vulnerabilities in the National Vulnerability Database because it has the least number of eyes able to look for them.
Yes, because it has helped OpenSSL a lot.
You're directing snark towards OpenSSL presumably because you think it's a poorly coded. If it was closed source you might not even be aware of the issues and there certainly wouldn't be the open source efforts to code alternatives.