Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha yes - that's my new religion based on consciousness. I thought there needed to be more innovation in religion, so I started one
While it is good to encourage people not to be judgmental or angry, I have to logically point out that your religion contradicts itself: Stating "judge nothing as "bad" or "evil"' and then stating "you are now free of any judgments, guilt, resistance, anger, or suffering of any kind." suggest that those things are undesirable traits. But isn't that a judgment?
Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
141–150 of 210 posts
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#142lmao, man i liked when the term "hacker" was directed toward blackhats. This whole "im a hacker" gig is hilarious.
> lmao, man i liked when the term "hacker" was directed toward blackhats. Well, that usage was incorrect, but I agree that nowadays everyone's calling themselves a hacker of some sort.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#143For those getting a 502, I'm working on the server, Elastic Beanstalk didn't scale fast enough >. Cached version here: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:F0QdH3... Or if you refresh a few times, it should come up.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#144This thread is a great example of why not to publicize your revenue or internal systems. At best, you'll get hate and resentment. At worst, you'll get hate, resentment, and a new competitor.
Every community is different. Park.io received nothing but love on Twitter earlier this weekend (https://twitter.com/IndieHackers/status/779330003829944320). The HN crowd is particularly cynical and prone to outrage/judgment in the comment section.
I got a similar response when I launched Indie Hackers itself in August. But despite some negative comments, most visitors loved it and 99% of the feedback I've gotten since then has been positive.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#145Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it mostly services domain squatters.
Isn't it the opposite? Rather than buying from the squatters, it encourages people to "wait out" the squatters using Park.io. To me, it seems that damages the squatting business model.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#147Slightlyy OT and probably naïve: what is the attractiveness of the .io TLD? If the .com isn't available, why is .io more desirable than any other? Is there a hard reason or is .io just fashionable?
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it has more to do with the fact that we've all wasted countless hours cycling through domain names only to encounter landing pages from squatters like park.io.
Squatters are the ultimate douchebags of the Internet era. I there should be some sort of tax for squatting a domain name. I.e first 10 domains names are cheap then they get expensive.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Top of HN traffic peaks at maybe 50-100 visitors per second. Unless you're serving a bunch of data, it really shouldn't be an issue. One problem I've run into is (I suspect) running out of sockets because they weren't getting recycled fast enough. This went away when I switched to Snap or Happstack. I used to have to "fix" this by killing and restarting my server every five minutes.
> Top of HN traffic peaks at maybe 50-100 visitors per second. That's true, but HN posts tend to go viral on other tech news sites. It's likely the majority of the traffic spikes are not originating on this site's link. I could be wrong though.
Re: Park.io – automating tasks to make $125k per month
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
> lmao, man i liked when the term "hacker" was directed toward blackhats. Well, that usage was incorrect, but I agree that nowadays everyone's calling themselves a hacker of some sort.
Enlighten us with the proper usage of the word hacker?