Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

news.ycombinator.com

431–440 of 535 posts

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#431

Good FOSS 3+ axis CAM software, preferably OS-agnostic. There's a quiet FOSS revolution happening in machine tool motion control: several usable CAD packages (FreeCAD, LibreCAD, SolveSpace, to name a few), a powerful motion controller (LinuxCNC), even a few open embedded servo drives. But flexible, powerful CAM to glue these parts together seems to be the type of tough niche problem, requiring a lot of domain knowled…

I think you could turn that into a billion dollar business. Start a consultative CAM company which used a commercial CAM software. Work closely with businesses to perform their CAM work for them. You'd need quick turn around and likely to do a lot of traveling. You'd need to hire some top notch NC programmers. Simultaneously hire some top notch software developers with either CAM or 3D graphics backgrounds. Initially have the NC programmers do all the work manually, then have the developers automate away processes so that the CAM work gradually becomes easier. The final goal would be to have software which is capable of taking data from a library of machine/control definitions you've built up doing work and using it to go straight from a CAD file to NC code; skipping the entire CAM process. In the end I think you'd have a cloud service which users uploaded CAD files to and downloaded NC files from. You could integrate this a step further by monitoring machine performance and integrating it with file generation. At that point you're in the "How could we apply machine learning to this?" territory. The neat thing is that you'd basically have the same upload/download workflow whether it was people or software doing the actual NC code generation, and that 3rd party NC code generation is a service which companies already pay for from small contractors. The biggest challenge would be liability in running the NC code. You'd need to work out all the contracts and having knowledgeable NC programmers would be key. Open source CAM software could be a side effect of this, something developed along the way to cut on scaling costs; if that makes sense. Though, just eliminating the manual CAM process would be the final goal, so I probably wouldn't invest too heavily into that. There's a million things which could be branched out into once integrated this heavily in the manufacturing process. You'd probably need about the standard YC handout to make the initial website and prove you could get orders to do the CAM work (this could potentially pivot into cloud based manufacturing management or services trade). You'd then need a couple million to actually hire NC programmers and computer programmers and deal with business costs. If you really wanted to do it right, add a couple million on to that for in house machines. At that point you're going to make back the investment money as the Uber of CAM services, and then, if you can pull off the engineering, you automate away the CAM process all together and completely change how subtractive manufacturing is done world wide.

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#432
OKC for child care. Families are different. Right now there is no way, outside of super-expensive agencies, to find a good nanny/family match.

Currently, THE website to find childcare is care.com . But when hiring families sign on, usually they auto-generate a profile using check boxes such as "We like arts and crafts!" or "Playing outdoors". So there is absolutely nothing to distinguish one family from another. (Hint: All parents say their kids like crafts and playing outdoors)

On the childcare provider side, since there is no good way to find the best match, the safe route is to also be generic. Maybe I could teach your kids to code and spin wool (true), but unless I'm willing to wait a long time for the right family to find me then I have to downplay (or just hide) many of the interesting things about me that very specific families would love.

Some families don't allow their kids to watch hardly any TV. Some allow them to play hours of video games. Some families want you to refer to dinosaurs as "dragons" because they are Young Earth Creationists. Some families want you to sing Mormon songs. Some families are fine with an LGBTQ+ nanny. Some would fire you if they knew.

I have worked for all of those families.

If that information could be gathered, and you could get a list of the best matches for your family (or vice versa), then the huge Russian Roulette risk of getting a new nanny/babysitter or finding a new job could be ameliorated.

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#433
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You would think it would be a no-brainer that everyone expects to work as it basically works to reach "everyone" in the world with far older technologies like physical mail, E-Mail and the telephone. We even have a standardized protocol (XMPP) to interoperate between IM services but it's largely unused because users mostly don't demand such a feature and big providers are better of locking everyone into a walled gard…

An open protocol can also lead to an inconsistent user experience. In the year 2016 I still have no idea how to send an image from one XMPP client to another and be sure that the sending side will receive it. In modern closed-off systems this is braindead simple. Part of this is due to how fragmented XMPP is, which I would again argue is due to its openness.

> An open protocol can also lead to an inconsistent user experience.

No more so than a proprietary protocol. All the IM clients and apps are different, just like all the email clients.

What matters is that I should be able to just get anybody's IM address and message them with my client and service of choice.

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#435
post #194

A way to use Mechanical Turk from outside the US. I've needed it with every client I ever worked with, and I need it now and know a dozen companies who do. CrowdFlower has a de facto monopoly on the outside of the US supply and charges an enormous premium for it - enough to turn off most of them. I certainly don't want to pay several thousand a month for the right to submit jobs, although I was ok with the 25% premiu…

I've used https://microworkers.com/ before (many years ago) and seems to do the job quite well.

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#436
post #149
post #2

I wish someone would build "Thunderbird" as a chrome application... Right now, there's not really a good multi-site email applciation... even if it were limited to IMAP, or on-server. Not sure what the limits on localStorage or indexedDB are for chrome apps. Would be happy if it stored the credentials online somehow allowing me to use it wherever. That's what I'd like to see, though I get most of what I need with web…

I think I read somewhere recently that Google is going to kill off chrome apps. Can anyone confirm?

It's true. Check here: https://blog.chromium.org/2016/08/from-chrome-apps-to-web.ht...

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#437
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An OS based on IPFS would give you the best of both worlds. AFAIK browsers are popular because they load apps quickly and without an install step. While native apps let you choose your stack. An OS based on IPFS would load big apps quickly thanks to caching, the install step would go away because there is no difference between remote files and local ones and its still an OS so the app can be written in C or any other…

Zero-install is half of the reason why browsers are popular. The other half is that the Web puts the users in far more control over the content in their viewport than anything else that has been widely deployed except for probably Microsoft Excel. If your first thought is that desire for control is a niche thing, an instance of power users projecting their biases onto the rest of the world and not a concern for some…

That doesn't explain the popularity of mobile apps among the "everyman". They're not very customizable, but they're considerably more popular than either the regular or mobile web.

> If your first thought is that desire for control is a niche thing, an instance of power users projecting their biases onto the rest of the world and not a concern for some mythical "everyman", you are wrong.

Evidence? Sales numbers tend to prove the opposite. It's the whole reason the apple ecosystem makes as much money as it does: it just works and it looks good doing it. Most people don't enjoy having to spend any time on getting anything to work or customizing anything to their liking. They just want it to do what it's supposed to do then go back to whatever it is they find more important.

Now, could a zero-install network of apps kill the browser? I'm not so sure. Developing native apps is a royal pain in the ass right now. But, if something like QML were to get a lot better and easier to use, it could take a dent out of the single page application market.

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#438

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which performance aspects of the FJ40 aren't addressed by modern 4WDs? Is it just nostalgia? Or do you genuinely want a car that has readily removable doors and windscreen?

This is a very long story, but I do genuinely want that. That's not to say that there aren't any modern improvements I wouldn't want to carry forward (coil-sprung solid axles are better, good AC is a must have, leather interiors are great) What I'd like from the 40-series: - A no-nonsense materials and rawer, more authetntic appearance. - Less injection molding, obvious ways to remove major panels - An upright sittin…

Ok fascinating. If you like the design aesthetics I fear you won't be satisfied unless you build one yourself...

I'm more concerned about entry angles, water crossing depth etc (it rains a lot on bad roads where I live). Also safety, old cars just can't compete traction control and 7 airbags.

Re reliability: is an FJ really more reliable than a modern equivalent car? And for me, I'm not repairing my own AK47 so it's more about cost of parts and availability of expertise, a modern Toyota makes a lot more sense...

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#439

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a very long story, but I do genuinely want that. That's not to say that there aren't any modern improvements I wouldn't want to carry forward (coil-sprung solid axles are better, good AC is a must have, leather interiors are great) What I'd like from the 40-series: - A no-nonsense materials and rawer, more authetntic appearance. - Less injection molding, obvious ways to remove major panels - An upright sittin…

Ok fascinating. If you like the design aesthetics I fear you won't be satisfied unless you build one yourself... I'm more concerned about entry angles, water crossing depth etc (it rains a lot on bad roads where I live). Also safety, old cars just can't compete traction control and 7 airbags. Re reliability: is an FJ really more reliable than a modern equivalent car? And for me, I'm not repairing my own AK47 so it's…

If you like the design aesthetics I fear you won't be satisfied unless you build one yourself...

I've resigned myself to that, which is why I own a 60-series, which is the closest thing to a modernized 40-series for less than 80k available.

I'm more concerned about entry angles, water crossing depth etc (it rains a lot on bad roads where I live). Also safety, old cars just can't compete traction control and 7 airbags.

The 40 had great entry and departure angles (My 60 has bad departure angles). Most modern SUVs are horrific, really just slightly raised minivans, with all sorts of junk hanging off the bottom to get torn off. I have no beef with traction control, I'd just like a pull knob to engage it.

Reliability

The 40 series was very reliable, and easy to work on by anyone. There have been improvements in machining, seals, etc. and I'd like a modernized, inline 6 turbo-diesel. Since none of this happening any time soon, especially in the states, I had this put in my 60:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woX_shdI2Xc

Re: Ask HN: What do you wish someone would build?

#440
post #375
post #194

A way to use Mechanical Turk from outside the US. I've needed it with every client I ever worked with, and I need it now and know a dozen companies who do. CrowdFlower has a de facto monopoly on the outside of the US supply and charges an enormous premium for it - enough to turn off most of them. I certainly don't want to pay several thousand a month for the right to submit jobs, although I was ok with the 25% premiu…

Hey there—I'm CEO and cofounder of Scale API (YC S16, https://scaleapi.com ), which is a developer-first API for human tasks. We allow customers outside the US, and are much more focused on quality than MTurk. Definitely give us a shot, and feel free to email me if you have any questions! alex@scaleapi.com

Hi Alex, thanks for your email. Replying here for the benefit of other readers.

We can't use your product for the same reason we can't use most of the alternatives on the market: there's no way to push tasks with custom HTML/CSS templates, as is possible with MTurk. This is important at scale.

Do let me know if this ever changes.

Post reply on HN