Live data from Hacker News

Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

cs.cmu.edu

131–140 of 160 posts

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My biggest problem with this is when the images auto-replacing your text emotes convey a completely different expression, and you have no control over it. Skype is the worst offender, where for example the ":3" cat-face gets replaced by an image of a whole cat, without a face at all. If you disable this "feature" in your options, it's only disabled on YOUR end. The receiving client will still convert your text into i…

Try sending a code snippet in any modern chat

Telegram is pretty good with that. One ` for inline code, three for blocks of code.

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My biggest problem with this is when the images auto-replacing your text emotes convey a completely different expression, and you have no control over it. Skype is the worst offender, where for example the ":3" cat-face gets replaced by an image of a whole cat, without a face at all. If you disable this "feature" in your options, it's only disabled on YOUR end. The receiving client will still convert your text into i…

Try sending a code snippet in any modern chat

[deleted]

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#133
post #65

Nabokov's interview. The New York Times [1969] -- How do you rank yourself among writers (living) and of the immediate past? -- I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile -- some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to your question.

Which had already been used in the days of the telegraph. The first use of OMG (oh my god) and other such initialisms was 19th. C. I would imagine that includes :)

Do you have a source for this?

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#136
post #27

It makes me a bit of a luddite (and a heck of a curmudgeon), but it always makes me a little sad when good ol' ASCII smileys are rendered all fancy-like. There's something charming and hackerish about showing it as a 7-bit glyph. I think the Internet fundamentally changed when that happened. Tangentially-related, I can't fathom why someone would post YouTube videos of `telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl`.

It's somewhat amusing that even the first IBM PC had a smiley character. It's character number 1, no less (in code page 437).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page_437

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#138
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Emojis are in Unicode. They aren't parsed or converted to multiple glyphs anymore, the text editor will provide them directly. http://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html I was doubtful of emojis at first, but now I'm loving the concept. They really help me communicate emotions that I wouldn't put into actual words. Smileys can't really do that. Culturally I see it as a the first universal (limited) language…

There have been attempts a universal language that are quite fascinating. There's an interesting RadioLab on the subject of Bissymbols. I suppose the one that sticks and evolves over time is the one that probably matters though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blissymbols http://www.radiolab.org/story/257194-man-became-bliss/

Maxor~ ellioid; s~h~ush UPCOM, shud shout aout aout. Ellioté brooghund brooghund.

Re: Original bulletin board thread in which ‘:-)’ was proposed

#140

I vividly remember having the following conversation with a fellow CMU undergrad around this time: Me: What's with all the :-) in the posts? Friend: It indicates joking. Me: Why? Friend: What's it look like? Me: A pinball plunger. Friend: Rotate 90 degrees. Me: Ohhhhhh. :-)

had a similar thing happen first time seeing: lol

thought it was a plate with knife and fork..

Post reply on HN