Venezuela is a failed state at this point. I'm more than happy to personally take them as an example of why spending big on social programs doesn't produce long-lasting social benefits. I understand many people will find a point of disagreement here. This is especially true when corruption is rife. In countries with high corruption, it seems the very best thing to do is to limit as much as possible how much money flo…
How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
41–50 of 186 posts
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but what about the other states that spend on social programs and ended up successful? This is like throwing out a carton of eggs because one of them broke.
Having social programs and being a Socialist government are two very different things. We can have Social Security here in the States and not be Socialist. Nordic "socialism" is just taxing the rich to give to the poor. What Venezuela did was textbook Socialism which, like Communism, is a path to economic, social, and political failure as well as massive human rights violations.
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#43Why can't they just ask other more friendly countries (Russia, Norway, maybe China) for the expertise in exchange for oil? Should be an easy solution, or am I missing something in my oversimplification? (And, please, don't blame it on communism/socialism; people have interests and I believe so do people in Venezuela - including those working in the government.)
This statement shows that you fundamentally don't understand the problems a socialist (or communist) economy runs into. People obviously have interests and incentives; people in Venezuela are people, just like people in the US.
But you can have an economic structure which helps align those incentives with productive work -- in a market economy, those running the oil industry are heavily incentivized to actually _produce oil_ and get paid for it.
When you have price controls and rampant shortages because of them, you can make far more money using your federal money to buy supplies and sell them on the black market, instead of fixing your oil rigs (because (1) you don't own the output and (2) the gas you sell is price controlled to ridiculously low levels).
If you have a government which turns a blind eye to rampant theft and cronyism, you're not even taking risks by doing the above -- it's practically condoned.
Russia, China, and Norway know that the government of Venezuela is just as likely to turn their kleptocratic ways on them, as soon as the going gets even tighter. The "state" oil industries in those countries are actually semi-private, and have actual financial incentives to not get screwed over.
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#44Venezuela is a failed state at this point. I'm more than happy to personally take them as an example of why spending big on social programs doesn't produce long-lasting social benefits. I understand many people will find a point of disagreement here. This is especially true when corruption is rife. In countries with high corruption, it seems the very best thing to do is to limit as much as possible how much money flo…
But Venezuela's example really tells us nothing about market-oriented welfare states, like the US and much of the EU.
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having social programs and being a Socialist government are two very different things. We can have Social Security here in the States and not be Socialist. Nordic "socialism" is just taxing the rich to give to the poor. What Venezuela did was textbook Socialism which, like Communism, is a path to economic, social, and political failure as well as massive human rights violations.
I think you'll find textbook socialism are very different to what you think socialism and communism are. Do the workers in Venezuela own the means of production?
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#46The wonders of socialism.
When people use Venezuela to criticize socialism, they always compare it to the most powerful, developed capitalist countries of the world. Look how poor and dysfunctional the failed state of Venezuela is compared to a capitalist country like the United States! When you compare Venezuela to those of its neighbors who are completely submitted to international capital and empire, capitalism doesn't seem so glamorous ei…
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#47The wonders of socialism.
Sincere question: HOW? I mean, even if we assume a socialist economy is terribly inefficient, like operating at 50% of the efficiency a capitalist one, it still should be enough for sustaining a resource-rich country. WTF they are doing so wrong?! Are they under intense internal or external sabotage? Corruption is so bad? I mean, this is not some mid-African country with >50% of the population illiterate, bunch of ho…
See also official food prices below production costs, empty stores and hunger.
As an aside here's an article on how things have gone in Venez vs Chile since 1975. http://humanprogress.org/blog/5-ways-capitalist-chile-is-muc...
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#48Venezuela is a failed state at this point. I'm more than happy to personally take them as an example of why spending big on social programs doesn't produce long-lasting social benefits. I understand many people will find a point of disagreement here. This is especially true when corruption is rife. In countries with high corruption, it seems the very best thing to do is to limit as much as possible how much money flo…
Yeah, but what about the other states that spend on social programs and ended up successful? This is like throwing out a carton of eggs because one of them broke.
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#49Why can't they just ask other more friendly countries (Russia, Norway, maybe China) for the expertise in exchange for oil? Should be an easy solution, or am I missing something in my oversimplification? (And, please, don't blame it on communism/socialism; people have interests and I believe so do people in Venezuela - including those working in the government.)
Re: How Bad Off Is Oil-Rich Venezuela? It’s Buying U.S. Oil
#50The wonders of socialism.
Sincere question: HOW? I mean, even if we assume a socialist economy is terribly inefficient, like operating at 50% of the efficiency a capitalist one, it still should be enough for sustaining a resource-rich country. WTF they are doing so wrong?! Are they under intense internal or external sabotage? Corruption is so bad? I mean, this is not some mid-African country with >50% of the population illiterate, bunch of ho…