House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
241–250 of 486 posts
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#242Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
'"Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys that wear yarmulkes every day." (Trump called the things written about him in the book "probably true.")' http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/8-of-the-sleaziest... Also Trump was the President of the Trump organization when the DOJ fined the company for illegal housing discrimination, doing things l…
That sounds more pro-Jewish than anti-black.
You might want to look into whether or not your understanding of the concept of racism comports with its actual definition.
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Bush administration ran private email servers to avoid FOIA requests, then nuked millions of saved emails when his term was up to avoid handing them over. Who cares? "But the other guys are corrupt too!" is not a great argument for your candidate. > I didn't see any huge circus or massive outcry about that. We can all agree this is a problem.
> We can all agree this is a problem. Funny how nobody seemed to think so until now.
[deleted]
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
National security issues brought into question vs. possible scam. Different issues. One disqualifies handling of sensitive info and public records, the other, trust in being ethical.
More relevantly, both disqualifying.
There's no qualification to be POTUS other than your age and whether you were born American.
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#246> "As a PST file or exported MSG files, this could be done though, yes? > The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you'd recognize, and we're trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it." From the way it reads it looks like he is asking how to bulk remove an email address from the archived messages so when they are turned over they don't contain the redacted…
Well, given that they probably search for email addresses as part of ediscovery, it would be an easy way to avoid hitting the search filter.
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their comment is referencing Correct The Record, a pro-Clinton PAC which, according to a popular but false Reddit rumor, employs commenters to anonymously spread propaganda. See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/4xcwjb/what_i... Edit: At the time of this edit, three replies have asked for a citation on "false", so I may as well put it here. Barrier Breakers 2016, the subject of the original The Dai…
>popular but false Why have you decided it's false?
I have edited my post to elaborate.
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their comment is referencing Correct The Record, a pro-Clinton PAC which, according to a popular but false Reddit rumor, employs commenters to anonymously spread propaganda. See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/4xcwjb/what_i... Edit: At the time of this edit, three replies have asked for a citation on "false", so I may as well put it here. Barrier Breakers 2016, the subject of the original The Dai…
> but false Any citation for that?
[deleted]
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their comment is referencing Correct The Record, a pro-Clinton PAC which, according to a popular but false Reddit rumor, employs commenters to anonymously spread propaganda. See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/4xcwjb/what_i... Edit: At the time of this edit, three replies have asked for a citation on "false", so I may as well put it here. Barrier Breakers 2016, the subject of the original The Dai…
What has proved it to be false?
[deleted]
Re: House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because she's trying to assign guilt by association. I'm sure most people that support white supremacy are, in fact, Trump supporters. Does that logically make all Trump supporters white supremacists? And what is wrong with a bit of Nationalism? I personally feel globalization has most been a clever campaign to allow large business to play wage arbitrage. The current division of wealth in the US supports my idea.
White nationalists support him more than any other Republican candidate and it's largely because he panders to them with thinly veiled or occasionally overt racism.
[deleted]