21–30 of 107 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To me, "source" implies where the wealth came from, and it's misleading to say that the Koch brothers grew rich from a diverse portfolio of anything. They were born into oil wealth.
Many of the people on this list should have their source listed as "birth".
Naïve question. The richest people in the world, who are billionaires from pretty much just stock. How do they convert that to real money to buy things? Do they just simply wait until the stock is at a high point, and sell a lot? Maybe move that money to other investments?
Naïve question. The richest people in the world, who are billionaires from pretty much just stock. How do they convert that to real money to buy things? Do they just simply wait until the stock is at a high point, and sell a lot? Maybe move that money to other investments?
These individuals can easily call up banks and get a loan on their worth. "Hey, Morgan Stanley I need 2 mil deposited in my account" - "ok" This is also how they avoid income tax. ;) They can take in millions and it's just a loan. Then they pay it back off with stock or other asset deals.
Naïve question. The richest people in the world, who are billionaires from pretty much just stock. How do they convert that to real money to buy things? Do they just simply wait until the stock is at a high point, and sell a lot? Maybe move that money to other investments?
At that level money takes on a whole new meaning. It's no longer a form of currency used to purchase things but more of an abstract perception of power.
It thoroughly undermines democracy, unless we want to redefine democracy as 1$ = 1 vote.
Naïve question. The richest people in the world, who are billionaires from pretty much just stock. How do they convert that to real money to buy things? Do they just simply wait until the stock is at a high point, and sell a lot? Maybe move that money to other investments?
First, nobody really needs a billion dollars in "cash" it just doesn't make sense as "cash" deposits pay a below inflation rate return in most places (meaning it loses its "value" over time) and even a negative interest rate in some places.
Second, it isn't like there is a "fixed amount of money" in the world and if someone has all of it, everyone else has none.
So if you are a billionaire, and most of your billions are in stock of a particular company, and you are a US citizen. You file a form with the Securities and Exchange commission (SEC) to sell some shares every month or quarter or year. Or you file a form that says you will sell X shares 3+ months from now. The SEC posts this information publicly so that other investors will know about it ahead of time and decide what to do. The point being that you are a "big investor" or an "insider" and selling might be seen as a signal, and this makes the signal loud and with a time delay so that the other investors can respond. Then the appointed time comes and your shares get dumped on the market and you collect however much money they happen to bring in (less taxes).
You will see lists like this one (http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/goog/insider-trades) for Google. Which itemize those sales. So lets say you need 15 million a month to operate your private jet, you set up a system that will sell enough stock to net at least 15 million a month to cover that. You don't want to sell it all since you might want to vote your shares but you have to get around so you let some go.
A lot of tech billionaires set up trusts for their children which they fund such that their children will never have to work and can live a comfortable lifestyle. A number of tech billionaires have been setting up foundations (like the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation) which can convert stock to cash in a tax advantaged way and do good things with it. Sometimes the foundations are created to give the billionaire a vehicle for influencing others while nominally keeping their hands clean. (not working so well for Trump and Clinton but I read about a number of foundations being used in this way.)
So generally if you look at the insider trading you will see billionaires selling stock in 10 to 100 million dollar chunks and using it for different things.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At that level money takes on a whole new meaning. It's no longer a form of currency used to purchase things but more of an abstract perception of power.
Perception? It IS power. The power to influence politicians and elections. The power to influence how we educate our youth (e.g. Bill Gates and Common Core). The power to dominate everything. It thoroughly undermines democracy, unless we want to redefine democracy as 1$ = 1 vote.
“Power resides where men believe it resides. No more and no less.”
These billionaire are powerful only because we have collectively decided to put such high value on the product of their companies and investments. It all stems from perception.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
These individuals can easily call up banks and get a loan on their worth. "Hey, Morgan Stanley I need 2 mil deposited in my account" - "ok" This is also how they avoid income tax. ;) They can take in millions and it's just a loan. Then they pay it back off with stock or other asset deals.
You might be able to move around when you incur income tax a little bit that way, but you can't avoid it.
Naïve question. The richest people in the world, who are billionaires from pretty much just stock. How do they convert that to real money to buy things? Do they just simply wait until the stock is at a high point, and sell a lot? Maybe move that money to other investments?
These individuals can easily call up banks and get a loan on their worth. "Hey, Morgan Stanley I need 2 mil deposited in my account" - "ok" This is also how they avoid income tax. ;) They can take in millions and it's just a loan. Then they pay it back off with stock or other asset deals.