> "As a PST file or exported MSG files, this could be done though, yes? > The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you'd recognize, and we're trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it." From the way it reads it looks like he is asking how to bulk remove an email address from the archived messages so when they are turned over they don't contain the redacted…
Who cares? "But the other guys are corrupt too!" is not a great argument for your candidate.
> I didn't see any huge circus or massive outcry about that.
We can all agree this is a problem.