Live data from Hacker News

Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

reddit.com

41–50 of 62 posts

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that were true, why did he specifically ask for help to "strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails". source: reddit via http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=38414

> > Yes it's pretty clear that the content of the email is not to be adjusted, just the To/From fields. > If that were true, why did he specifically ask for help to "strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails". What your quote said he asked for help to do is exactly what GP suggested was the only thing he was trying to do. So, what you say he asked is exactly what you'd expect i…

Oh right I had that exactly backwards... I apologize, it's been long day.

It does make me wonder why this matters, though. Ripping the to/from from an export would be trivially easy. He wanted to strip it from the server for some reason. So that doesn't make me feel better... isn't it what you would do to prevent emails from being discovered. I mean if they wanted to sanitize files after export, it's just bulk search and replace, right?

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#42

Exactly why I thought HN might find this story interesting, the 'we did it reddit!' factor is funny in light of the many times they've gotten things horribly wrong -- the Boston marathon bombing comes to mind. Kind of wish it hadn't been flagged and disappeared from the front page so quickly.

Improperly marking a similar post this morning as a "dupe" didn't work -- https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=threepipeproblm -- so people who don't want to hear this seem to have "flagged" it as off topic? Meanwhile, some recent HN topics that were not flagged as off topic include: * The '80s Public Access Films Produced by a California UFO Cult * Affliction and Salvation: Love Was a Learned Art for Iris Murdoch…

Possibly relevant: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolli...

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> > Yes it's pretty clear that the content of the email is not to be adjusted, just the To/From fields. > If that were true, why did he specifically ask for help to "strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails". What your quote said he asked for help to do is exactly what GP suggested was the only thing he was trying to do. So, what you say he asked is exactly what you'd expect i…

Oh right I had that exactly backwards... I apologize, it's been long day. It does make me wonder why this matters, though. Ripping the to/from from an export would be trivially easy. He wanted to strip it from the server for some reason. So that doesn't make me feel better... isn't it what you would do to prevent emails from being discovered. I mean if they wanted to sanitize files after export, it's just bulk search…

> Ripping the to/from from an export would be trivially easy. He wanted to strip it from the server for some reason.

He wanted to strip it from a file that remained otherwise in the same format as was stored on the server; perhaps it was expected that there would be an electronic release in that format rather than plain text, perhaps he just had a suboptimal preparation-for-release workflow (redact the mailbox copy -> export as text) rather than the reverse.

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#44
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, Obama endorsed HRC.

How does the President get to dictate how the Justice dept rules? The executive and judicial branches are separate

The DOJ is not a part of the judicial branch - it is under the executive branch. https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/executive-branch

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#45

At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.

Let's not forget, Combetta didn't have a security clearance.. just immunity.

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#47
post #30

At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.

This seems to have taken place in July 2014, which is many months before the emails went missing (Mar. 2015). Even taking into account that he was apparently instructed to delete the email in Dec. 2014 (and forgot to), it still leaves a large amount of time between these two incidents.

Look at the timing as laid out in

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-19/dear-fbi-does-const...

and it's more clear.

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#48

Exactly why I thought HN might find this story interesting, the 'we did it reddit!' factor is funny in light of the many times they've gotten things horribly wrong -- the Boston marathon bombing comes to mind. Kind of wish it hadn't been flagged and disappeared from the front page so quickly.

Improperly marking a similar post this morning as a "dupe" didn't work -- https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=threepipeproblm -- so people who don't want to hear this seem to have "flagged" it as off topic? Meanwhile, some recent HN topics that were not flagged as off topic include: * The '80s Public Access Films Produced by a California UFO Cult * Affliction and Salvation: Love Was a Learned Art for Iris Murdoch…

I'm not one of the people to flag or downvote this, but all the post shows is that he wanted to keep some email addresses private. I'm not sure why people think this is a smoking gun? I get that people hate HRC, but how is a desire to tokenize email addresses noteworthy?

Edit: Also, the title doesn't fit the post.

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#49
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Improperly marking a similar post this morning as a "dupe" didn't work -- https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=threepipeproblm -- so people who don't want to hear this seem to have "flagged" it as off topic? Meanwhile, some recent HN topics that were not flagged as off topic include: * The '80s Public Access Films Produced by a California UFO Cult * Affliction and Salvation: Love Was a Learned Art for Iris Murdoch…

I'm not one of the people to flag or downvote this, but all the post shows is that he wanted to keep some email addresses private. I'm not sure why people think this is a smoking gun? I get that people hate HRC, but how is a desire to tokenize email addresses noteworthy? Edit: Also, the title doesn't fit the post.

Maybe because (a) he didn't use the language of tokenization, he asked how to "strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails", and

(b)He just plead the 5th on questions involving whether or not he complied with the investigation legally, which people normally do to avoid incriminating themselves.

At least that's how I understand the situation.

Re: Hillary's IT guy asking Reddit how to cover up emails

#50
Assuming it's true it isn't incriminating but it does kind of make him look like an idiot. Posting to reddit anything about a VIP seems like a bad idea. Posting it under a username you use all over the internet is even worse. I think it adds to the list of bad decisions HRC and her subordinates have made regarding email in specific and technology in general.
Post reply on HN