11–20 of 62 posts
As much as I hate HRC, I really don't think the email issue is ever going to lead to anything. Not for her at least. Some poor IT guy may get it in the end, but it's painfully obvious the same rules do not apply to elected officials as they do to the rest of us.
At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.
It is, but it isn't.
One could argue that someone, let's say Bob, happened to overhear some guy named Paul needing to do exactly this. He overheard it at a bar.
Bob then thought "oh, well if it's someone really VIP, this could make for some good lulz with my efriends. Who does Paul work for that is _really_ VIP? Let me Google Paul."
"Oh, here's his email address... stonetear@gmail.com. I wonder if he's on reddit. ... Guess not. Let's make a post that's pretty obviously incriminating."
I think that'd be the first argument made, at least. IANAL, but I do have some courtroom experience.
An IP is also not a person, https://torrentfreak.com/ip-address-not-person-140324/
As much as I hate HRC, I really don't think the email issue is ever going to lead to anything. Not for her at least. Some poor IT guy may get it in the end, but it's painfully obvious the same rules do not apply to elected officials as they do to the rest of us.
At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.
At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.
> This is pretty incriminating. It is, but it isn't. One could argue that someone, let's say Bob, happened to overhear some guy named Paul needing to do exactly this. He overheard it at a bar. Bob then thought "oh, well if it's someone really VIP, this could make for some good lulz with my efriends. Who does Paul work for that is _really_ VIP? Let me Google Paul." "Oh, here's his email address... stonetear@gmail.com.…
I believe it, but can't he just claim coincidence on the Reddit handle?
At first I thought this was a total hoax, but the account has been deleted and the incriminating posts are over 2 years old. Here is a pastebin I found of online information linking all his profiles together: http://pastebin.com/NmXcUC1X This is pretty incriminating.
> This is pretty incriminating. It is, but it isn't. One could argue that someone, let's say Bob, happened to overhear some guy named Paul needing to do exactly this. He overheard it at a bar. Bob then thought "oh, well if it's someone really VIP, this could make for some good lulz with my efriends. Who does Paul work for that is _really_ VIP? Let me Google Paul." "Oh, here's his email address... stonetear@gmail.com.…
There's now a post in /r/exchangeserver that's making fun of this old post[1], but is there a link to the original (or has the post been deleted?). I'm still rather skeptical of things I read on /r/conspiracy. 1. https://www.reddit.com/r/exchangeserver/comments/53ick9/remo...
Anyway, I don't have a horse in this race, just thought it was an interesting story both politically and from a security perspective.
This seems like enough to demonstrate intent (the big thing they couldn't prove previously) is there any reason this isn't enough evidence to open a case by the justice department?