Great news and congrats to everyone involved! Among the highlights of this release is Xwidgets, which allows embedding GTK+ widgets inside Emacs buffers. One such widget is WebKitGTK+, a full-featured port of WebKit for use in GTK+ apps. As a consequence of this you can now browse the internet and maybe watch some YouTube inside Emacs [0]. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/4srze9/watching_yout...
1. Isn't embedding a browser like this a security risk? 2. Can we now move M-x customize to gtk widgets?
Emacs 25.1 released
11–20 of 151 posts
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#12Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would it be any more of a security risk than using a stand-alone browser?
Standalone browsers make a lot of special efforts to isolate pages from one another. Does embedding have the same guarantees?
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#14But I'm wondering, why not provide the PGP signatures for the code over HTTPS instead of HTTP?
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#15Great news and congrats to everyone involved! Among the highlights of this release is Xwidgets, which allows embedding GTK+ widgets inside Emacs buffers. One such widget is WebKitGTK+, a full-featured port of WebKit for use in GTK+ apps. As a consequence of this you can now browse the internet and maybe watch some YouTube inside Emacs [0]. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/4srze9/watching_yout...
1. Isn't embedding a browser like this a security risk? 2. Can we now move M-x customize to gtk widgets?
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#16Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#17Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. Isn't embedding a browser like this a security risk? 2. Can we now move M-x customize to gtk widgets?
When you say "move M-x customize to gtk widgets", which text based would you replace with GTK widgets? Customize certainly doesn't initially seem as friendly as a traditional preferences dialog, but I would be hesitant to lose the "it's all text" navigability and consistency.
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#19Having been using emacs on and off, both on Windows and Linux, and having found it being useful on some occasions, I somehow can't help thinking of it as more of a historical artifact than a toolset I would want to use on a daily basis. Being a very powerful personal computing environment and kinda fun to use, to me emacs still falls short in the ways that, for instance, UNIX command line interface with its simple si…
Emacs is an perhaps the most ambitious implementation of a layer above shells and /_/nix philosophy.
The problem I have with Emacs is the surface area feels infinitly large and some features can be buggy.
I choose to use both.
Re: Emacs 25.1 released
#20Having been using emacs on and off, both on Windows and Linux, and having found it being useful on some occasions, I somehow can't help thinking of it as more of a historical artifact than a toolset I would want to use on a daily basis. Being a very powerful personal computing environment and kinda fun to use, to me emacs still falls short in the ways that, for instance, UNIX command line interface with its simple si…