Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Energous’ technology involves more than just a charging mat to lay devices on top of. The company’s transmitter broadcasts proprietary waveforms directly to receivers and then surrounds those receivers with a radio frequency “pocket” that charges devices. The signals can travel up to 15 feet, and up to 12 devices can be charged at once." This quote sums up the difference
Yay a proprietary changing protocol so I will need how many different wireless charging stations? Sigh.
Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
31–40 of 71 posts
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#32Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#33Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#34Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like a solar powered watch or calculator?
Arguably, yes. Of course, the power requirement to recharge a battery for a calculator (in a decent amount of time) is a lot less than that for a modern cell phone. Same physics if your level of detail is Ohm's Law but very different in practice because we are talking about charging a phone batt in a comparable time to plugging it in.
Solar is equally crappy.
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#36My understanding, though, is that all of these wireless charging solutions are significantly less efficient that wired power. Even if it's, say, 10% less efficient, that's a huge, huge waste of energy on a large scale if this technology becomes popular.
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#37This way they can remove the only plug on the new iPhones. :)
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#38My understanding, though, is that all of these wireless charging solutions are significantly less efficient that wired power. Even if it's, say, 10% less efficient, that's a huge, huge waste of energy on a large scale if this technology becomes popular.
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't mind it. For a lot of my devices if you put on the wireless charger the wrong way you come up to a dead device. This would theoretically allow you to be fully charged if there were enough beacons in a building.
Most people would not mind wireless power that's not dangerous, but that is not a pragmatic reasoning behind why it will happen soon, but didn't happen in the past. Right?
Re: Apple is working with Energous on wireless charging
#40My understanding, though, is that all of these wireless charging solutions are significantly less efficient that wired power. Even if it's, say, 10% less efficient, that's a huge, huge waste of energy on a large scale if this technology becomes popular.
Why would it not be absorbed by proportional savings in heating?