Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really quite understand all the love of GitLab - Open Source - Free private repos - Free self-host (edit to add "Free") - Everything in one spot (repos, ci, review, coding environment, etc...)
It's only kind of open source, and only partly. They call it open core, so saying open source outright is a bit misleading. The review feature is very new in GL, and that plus all of the things you are mentioning within "everything in one spot" is available in this update (except maybe the coding env, not sure what that means anyway), if you've read the announcement. Github also has self hosting.
Announcing new tools, forums, and features
111–120 of 282 posts
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#112Missed opportunity to call the platform forum the "GitHub PlatForum."
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#113Is this the death of Trello?
I'd switch instantly if: 1. There was a faster and more contextual way to edit issues on a project. 2. There was a way to set up an opinionated workflow where e.g. opening a PR against an issue moves the issue to "Review"; closing said PR moves issue to "Done" and closes it; closing an issue directly moves it to "Done" and vice versa. Without this, there's way too much interaction required for even GitHub's own prefe…
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#114This is a rough summary of what all I read in the blog post: 1. projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. 2. code reviews allow approval/request changes as sunny's screenshot shows 3. reviews can be made mandatory. 4. github platform integrations is getting a roadmap 5. a graphql api to query their database 6. enforce 2fa in organizations (much love for this one) 7. summarized time…
>projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. This is really not about replacing those services, it's more about building a better foundation for integrators like Waffle and ZenHub to build on.
Shameless plug: Zube has all these things and more - https://zube.io :)
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
As well as the sibling comments here, one could also argue Gitlab deserves at least partial credit for motivating this pick up in pace.
I think it was more the open letter to Github, which motivated both Github and GitLab (seen as an opportunity to compete). GitLab's roadmap yesterday surely didn't motivate or spawn the "New GitHub Universe," and I wouldn't think that Github is very nervous about GitLab currently due to it's massive lead in the market. Maybe this new round of funding made some of the folks at Github look over at Gitlab, but I doubt t…
Just my 2 cents, but I think they very well should be
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#116I'd really like it if the Pull Requests page would denote which PRs I've already approved. That is one thing I really liked from Bitbucket, it makes it easy to skip over what I've already approved. It would become slightly more complex though, because then you'd probably want to see something for PRs you've approved but had subsequent changes on.
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#117Can we import a Trello project with all it's lists/cards seamlessly into a github repos `project`?
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
github has self-hosting. It is a little pricey but that is not a product differentiator.
No-one said it was. But the answer of self-hosting is a perfectly valid answer for "Why the love for GitLab?" when one = $0 in licensing, and the other = > $2,500/year in licensing.
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#119The inconsistent and non-sensical font and white space on the new profile pages is giving me an indescribable form of anxiety. If anybody out from the GH design team is out there, please put it back to how it was. :(. Example: https://github.com/Miserlou 10 font sizes is too many for any one page.
Re: Announcing new tools, forums, and features
#120The improvements to code reviews are really exciting. Having comments submit all at once instead of one at a time is a great UX change, I've definitely gotten sidetracked mid-review because somebody started responding to my initial comments when I'm neck deep. Comment threading is super useful for discussion-heavy comments like code review, and an in-UI approve/request changes is great.