Example: https://github.com/Miserlou
10 font sizes is too many for any one page.
91–100 of 282 posts
Example: https://github.com/Miserlou
10 font sizes is too many for any one page.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really quite understand all the love of GitLab - Open Source - Free private repos - Free self-host (edit to add "Free") - Everything in one spot (repos, ci, review, coding environment, etc...)
> Open source* The Enterprise edition features[1] are closed source, and these aren't strictly "enterprise-y" features like SAML authentication. It includes plenty of "basic" workflow features found on GitHub: - Rebase merge requests before merge - Use fast-forward merges when possible - Create templates for issues and merge requests - Display merge request status for builds on Jenkins CI [1] https://about.gitlab.com…
GitHub (annoyingly) can't do fast-forward merges from non-squashed PRs either.
Display merge request status for builds on Jenkins CI
GitLab implements basically the same API as GitHub for updating build status of commits from external services, or do I misunderstand what feature you mean?
But in general I agree, there are some options GitLab reserved for EE that really feel like they should be part of the CE as well.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really quite understand all the love of GitLab except rooting for the underdog. and self-hosting :-)
github has self-hosting. It is a little pricey but that is not a product differentiator.
But the answer of self-hosting is a perfectly valid answer for "Why the love for GitLab?" when one = $0 in licensing, and the other = > $2,500/year in licensing.
This is a rough summary of what all I read in the blog post: 1. projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. 2. code reviews allow approval/request changes as sunny's screenshot shows 3. reviews can be made mandatory. 4. github platform integrations is getting a roadmap 5. a graphql api to query their database 6. enforce 2fa in organizations (much love for this one) 7. summarized time…
>projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. This is really not about replacing those services, it's more about building a better foundation for integrators like Waffle and ZenHub to build on.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really quite understand all the love of GitLab except rooting for the underdog. and self-hosting :-)
github has self-hosting. It is a little pricey but that is not a product differentiator.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really quite understand all the love of GitLab - Open Source - Free private repos - Free self-host (edit to add "Free") - Everything in one spot (repos, ci, review, coding environment, etc...)
> Open source* The Enterprise edition features[1] are closed source, and these aren't strictly "enterprise-y" features like SAML authentication. It includes plenty of "basic" workflow features found on GitHub: - Rebase merge requests before merge - Use fast-forward merges when possible - Create templates for issues and merge requests - Display merge request status for builds on Jenkins CI [1] https://about.gitlab.com…
It has many enterprise features including code ownership, issue templates, and a Gerrit like, sane code review workflow. You can fully integrate it with your CI tool and it even displays coverage results inline and such.
Ask me anything about it :) I'm not affiliated with it but am an experienced user.
There's some nice stuff here -- probably some of it that I'll use -- but most of this is targeted at organisations (and in particular, managers and administrators) rather than individual developers. Understandable -- it's clearly companies that are paying the bills these days -- but a little disappointing given the extent to which GitHub got big by attracting lone hackers and little open source projects. If somebody…
This is a rough summary of what all I read in the blog post: 1. projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. 2. code reviews allow approval/request changes as sunny's screenshot shows 3. reviews can be made mandatory. 4. github platform integrations is getting a roadmap 5. a graphql api to query their database 6. enforce 2fa in organizations (much love for this one) 7. summarized time…
>projects. replaces trello, waffle.io, zenhub and many other similar services. This is really not about replacing those services, it's more about building a better foundation for integrators like Waffle and ZenHub to build on.
This will inevitably force out GH's integration partners once users start to complain how feature-deficient projects are in their current state.
The inconsistent and non-sensical font and white space on the new profile pages is giving me an indescribable form of anxiety. If anybody out from the GH design team is out there, please put it back to how it was. :(. Example: https://github.com/Miserlou 10 font sizes is too many for any one page.