Live data from Hacker News

Libtiff goes offline

madfileformatscience.garymcgath.com

111–120 of 121 posts

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#111

Tiff? That is a format I haven't heard in a long time. edit: to everyone replying. TIFF is awful. We have lossless compression now (read PNG) which is at least a billion times better. We shouldn't use it for anything in this day and age. Hell, just DEFLATE your TIFF and call it a new format. It will be better than TIFF

TIFF is like a container format. It supports lossless compression. Read up.

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#112
post #5

because @libtiff is already taken on Github, I think libtiff.gitlab.io is okay enough

It doesn't seem to be actively used in the past few years, though; isn't there a process one can use to claim unused github user / org names? Might be worth talking to GitHub staff about...

There is definitely process and they should apply for it. Hopefully it's free and not hosting active private repos.

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#113

Tiff? That is a format I haven't heard in a long time. edit: to everyone replying. TIFF is awful. We have lossless compression now (read PNG) which is at least a billion times better. We shouldn't use it for anything in this day and age. Hell, just DEFLATE your TIFF and call it a new format. It will be better than TIFF

[deleted]

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#114
post #110
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NO. That is an old, hijacked domain. Read the story on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibTIFF .

Oh, very annoying that remotesensing.org links to libtiff.org then!

Yes. The real libtiff people are trying to resolve that with the domain owner; he seems to be at least a little bit more cooperative than the libtiff.org one.

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#115
post #71
post #3

The code is now being hosted at http://www.simplesystems.org/libtiff/ with a mirror site at http://libtiff.maptools.org/ .

There is also a github mirror at https://github.com/vadz/libtiff .

The nice thing is that every libtiff tarball contains a copy of the web site. So at https://rawgit.com/vadz/libtiff/master/html/index.html you can view a partially functional site (the images don't work very well).

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#116

Tiff? That is a format I haven't heard in a long time. edit: to everyone replying. TIFF is awful. We have lossless compression now (read PNG) which is at least a billion times better. We shouldn't use it for anything in this day and age. Hell, just DEFLATE your TIFF and call it a new format. It will be better than TIFF

As far as I know, PNG does not support CMYK nor spot colors.

Nor clipping paths.

For print, there is not really an "open" alternative that is as good as TIFF.

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I won't use github for my own projects because I don't agree with their politics. (If you're ok with them, good for you. I won't stop you.) Mandating github for everybody is a Bad Idea.

What do you disagree with? I am receptive to this kind of argument, I am honestly curious for specifics.

Github had a feminism mini-scandal a couple years ago: http://www.theverge.com/2014/3/15/5512462/github-developer-l...

Re: Libtiff goes offline

#119
post #87
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know of any other application-independent image format with good support for layers. Seriously. (Even Tiff doesn't really have good support for layers.) .PSD is tightly tied to Photoshop's internals, and .xcf is tightly tied to Gimp's internals. (The Gimp core developers explicitly recommend against using .xcf as an interchange format, even though the format has a fairly complete publicly available spec.) I'v…

What happened with the OpenRaster format?

Oh, very cool, it looks like they are making good progress!

Unfortunately, it looks like there's no support for it in Photoshop, and I doubt that's likely to change.

Post reply on HN