Earlier quoted context omitted.
The education market won't fix itself because students are not in a sufficiently secure bargaining position where they (collectively) can make an informed decision that corrects the market.
What? How is the education loan market any different than the automobile or home loan market with respect bargaining position and ability to make an informed decision? Loan issuers are forced to issue loans without regard to the likelihood those loans will be paid back. Someone seeking a computer science degree from Stanford is treated the same as someone getting an English degree from a 4th tier state school. That's…
But with education, students have likely never bought a car, or a house, and don't have much background or life experience at this point in their lives and you want them to make a one-time, long-term, investment decision in a non-fungible asset?
Most students only make the decision once and whatever you learn about the school or career not meeting expectations isn't ever applied again. Worse, you don't find out first hand what quality your education really was until after leaving the college. Worst, the decision isn't really couched in terms of a ROI type investment decision (maybe thats changing), but that's certainly not the only factor at play in student school decision.
That's not a good basis for balancing a market.
> Loan issuers are forced to issue loans without regard to the likelihood those loans will be paid back. Private loan issuers aren't forced to do anything. They can always leave the market and invest elsewhere if they cant figure out how the serve the market.