Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you looking into storage as well? The engineer in me says caching is the way to convert an intermittent source to a steady load. I'm really curious what a wind investor is thinking about this!
Have we looked at it, yes. Are we investing in battery storage, no. It's too early for us to invest in this technology. This should be interesting for energy investors with a slightly higher risk appetite.
Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
111–120 of 365 posts
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Especially "_human_ flourishing and happiness". Why only human? Why not the well-being of all conscious creatures?
When someone comes up with an objective measure of consciousness lets consider that. In the meantime I see no issue with optimising for human happiness in the general case.
In many religious and philosophical traditions though the principle of Panpsychism is the guideline. It means, approximately, that consciousness is an inherent building block of reality and some form of consciousness is an emergent phenomena of just about any sufficiently complex system. This posits the existence of many forms of consciousness that are utterly alien to human consciousness and that we could not readily interact with.
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#113https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16K4gNhy_AN8Eg4Ov3z7p...
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
I sometimes think they reject the idea that the whole point of existence is human flourishing and happiness. Yes, many people reject this idea. As a matter of fact, this is the first time I've ever heard anyone express this idea.
theres also religious folks who believe the earth was created specifically for humans, and so everything here is for us and us alone. I find it a rather disgustingly self centered ideology. To presume that one (or ones species) is the most important thing in the world (or universe) is basically the definition of narcissism
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#115Notice this is because 80% of the energy obtained was from Hydroelectric power, which is a great energy source because it is reliable - unlike wind and solar which in this case provided 7% and 0.01% respectively and are not reliable. It frustrates me that so many environmentalists are still against hydro because it alters ecosystems when nature itself is inherently violent, dangerous and in a constant state of flux.…
In Chile, the mining companies in the North use a disproportionate amount of energy. They are located in one of the driest deserts in the world and could easily supply their power needs from solar with minimal impact. Instead they continually fight to build dams in pristine temperate rain forest in the South.
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I sometimes think they reject the idea that the whole point of existence is human flourishing and happiness. Yes, many people reject this idea. As a matter of fact, this is the first time I've ever heard anyone express this idea.
theres also religious folks who believe the earth was created specifically for humans, and so everything here is for us and us alone. I find it a rather disgustingly self centered ideology. To presume that one (or ones species) is the most important thing in the world (or universe) is basically the definition of narcissism
Not "one" nor the species, but exclusively for the "believers". Non-believers, heretics & infidels be damned.
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#117" its per capita electricity consumption is about one-quarter of, say, France or Belgium." Its in the bottom quartile worldwide I believe. Also the recommendations for the USA are way off. The "only way" to reach this goal is apparently to build lots of wind and solar. No mention whatsoever of nuclear, which is by far the more practical solution. And far less ecologically damaging.
>No mention whatsoever of nuclear, which is by far the more practical solution. And far less ecologically damaging. The UK's new Hinckley point power plant is both more expensive than solar/wind and puts the UK's energy generation in Chinese hands. There's a reason why Angela Merkel (relevant: probably the only physicist head of state) decided to shift to wind and solar.
That's actually fascinating. She was a physical chemist research scientist, not just undergraduate [1]. I wonder how many other scientist heads of state there have been.
Margaret Thatcher was a research chemist (food scientist) [2], but that's the only other one I know of.
Edit: she was the first British Prime Minister with a Science degree [3].
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher
[3]: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n11/david-runciman/rat-a-tat-a-tat-a-tat-a-tatRe: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#118Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#119Notice this is because 80% of the energy obtained was from Hydroelectric power, which is a great energy source because it is reliable - unlike wind and solar which in this case provided 7% and 0.01% respectively and are not reliable. It frustrates me that so many environmentalists are still against hydro because it alters ecosystems when nature itself is inherently violent, dangerous and in a constant state of flux.…
I live in the heart of the PNW and most of my power comes from COAL. The rest; natural gas. It's insane. We could power three states by damming a few rivers. I'm not an expert, but I also think it's more than possible to do that in a way that still let's salmon spawn, depending on how well things like fish ladders and run-of-the-river actually works. I'm pretty sure BC get's the majority of their power from hydro, and from how much time local fishermen spend up there, the salmon are doing just fine.
Re: Costa Rica has gone 76 days using 100% renewable electricity
#120Objection: Geothermal technically isn't renewable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power#Environmental...