I am a fast webpage
51–60 of 292 posts
Re: I am a fast webpage
#52Just to point out, there's no particular reason to host a page like this on a VPS at all. You could just throw it on S3. Even better, you could put it behind a CDN like Cloudfront and the total cost would be a dollar or two a month, not $25+ and it would be significantly faster.
Or even better, Surge.sh. - A very happy customer.
Re: I am a fast webpage
#53Re: I am a fast webpage
#54It enforces a set of rules to accelerate web pages. These rules can be used to validate your pages.
Re: I am a fast webpage
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is this image inlining thing something new? No, it's been around since forever. Just not used terribly often. > Am I reading it correctly that the images are encoded in base64 and delivered as html? Surely this is a bad idea... no? It depends. Making a new request to fetch the image always has overhead. Whether that overhead is bigger or smaller than the overhead of base64-encoding the image depends on: • file size…
Completely offtopic, but how do you type •? I like it.
ex: "・"
Re: I am a fast webpage
#56Re: I am a fast webpage
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is this image inlining thing something new? No, it's been around since forever. Just not used terribly often. > Am I reading it correctly that the images are encoded in base64 and delivered as html? Surely this is a bad idea... no? It depends. Making a new request to fetch the image always has overhead. Whether that overhead is bigger or smaller than the overhead of base64-encoding the image depends on: • file size…
Completely offtopic, but how do you type •? I like it.
On windows you can do alt+numpad 2022
On whatever is handling input for this XFCE system, control+shift+U 2022+Enter types it.
Re: I am a fast webpage
#58Re: I am a fast webpage
#59Just to point out, there's no particular reason to host a page like this on a VPS at all. You could just throw it on S3. Even better, you could put it behind a CDN like Cloudfront and the total cost would be a dollar or two a month, not $25+ and it would be significantly faster.
> You could just throw it on S3. Even better, you could put it behind a CDN like Cloudfront and the total cost would be a dollar or two a month, not $25+ and it would be significantly faster. I apologize for quibbling (really, I do! but I'm an infrastructure guy! This is my bag!). Yes, host it on S3, but ALWAYS put a CDN in front of S3 with long cache times (even just Cloudfront works). S3 can sporadically take hundr…