Live data from Hacker News

AirPods

apple.com

61–70 of 91 posts

Re: AirPods

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They claim that a 15-minute charge from the case gives 3 hours of battery life. That seems fairly usable -- perfect for a charge-up during bathroom breaks.

A perfect solution, because there's no way in hell you'll ever want to take these into the bathroom. Tilt your head to the right and plop , you just dropped $75 in the toilet.

At least in a toilet it'll be right next to all the other turds Apple has come out with over the years.

Re: AirPods

#62
Having them chargeable over the phone's lightning port (like the iPad stylus) seems like such an obvious option. No silly carry case required. I wonder if they looked into this.

Re: AirPods

#64
post #35

Looking at the last slide "Automatic setup. Seamless switching." What exactly is the W1? Can it work with an older MacBook, or would you need a not-yet-announced MacBook?

The footnote says that it requires an iCloud account. Are these even Bluetooth? Maybe they always remain connected to your iPhone, and the other devices stream to the iPhone first.

Looks like these are indeed Bluetooth http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMEF2AM/A/airpods

Connections AirPods: Bluetooth

And then further down Compatibility: iPhone 5 and up

iPhone 5 has Bluetooth 4.0 So I'm guessing the pairing information is shared via iCloud

Re: AirPods

#65
post #8

Three things I really hope they do: 1) Come out with a phone case that can hold the AirPods, and ideally charge them (Maybe enhance the battery case they already have?). I don't want yet another thing in my pocket, especially one I also have to remember to charge. Let me charge my phone, which can then charge my airpods. Let me always have my airpods on me by attaching them to my phone. 2) Make a "Find my Airpods" fe…

from the linked page:

>... thanks to a charging case that holds multiple additional charges for more than 24 hours of listening time.5 Need a quick charge? Just 15 minutes in the case gives you 3 hours of listening time.

Your wish #1 has come true!

Re: AirPods

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They claim that a 15-minute charge from the case gives 3 hours of battery life. That seems fairly usable -- perfect for a charge-up during bathroom breaks.

A perfect solution, because there's no way in hell you'll ever want to take these into the bathroom. Tilt your head to the right and plop , you just dropped $75 in the toilet.

whamlastxmas>> You must be a modern day version of one of Aesops Fables.

Re: AirPods

#67
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Minor inconvenience in the grand scheme of life doesn't mean it can't be a major inconvenience in the moment. And when I'm out, or indisposed to charge my headphones, in that moment it's a major inconvenience. Especially for a solution that went in search of a problem that didn't exist.

I believe you're firmly in the camp of first world problems. As far as I can tell they are the first wireless earphones to even address this problem with not one (external battery) but two (rapid charging) solutions at once.

Sure, but we're having this conversation on a forum for members of a rather upper middle class profession using a $1000 computer, talking about a $600 phone. We're all firmly in the camp of first world problems. Being extremely fortunate to have these problems doesn't delegitimize them. Nobody's saying it's on par with anything truly terrible in the world.

Re: AirPods

#68
I hope Apple will sell an AirPod (either left or right) individually since these are definitely going to be the socks of the technology world.

Re: AirPods

#70
post #55

So they just deprecated hundreds of perfectly viable audio accessories which have better sound quality than their proprietary premium product just so you are dependent on yet another Apple product? Maximum vendor lock-in. And please don't say "everyone can make a Bluetooth speaker". They will probably come up with some artificial license which makes it "iPhone certified" so that even there they can squeeze some cold…

> just so you are dependent on yet another Apple product The hardware requirements of a headphone jack put some very real limitations on phone design (waterproofing, interior space taken up by the digital -> analog hardware, etc). Whether that was the driving cause or not is in the air, but "getting people to buy Lightning stuff" isn't the only reason to do it.

The iPhone 7 is not waterproof but splash resistant at most. Xperia line is and it has a jack. Interior space? You noticed the camera bulge, right?

It is a fad they are pushing.

Post reply on HN