Live data from Hacker News

Yelp Increasing Transparency and Eliminating 'Favorite Review'

officialblog.yelp.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Yelp Increasing Transparency and Eliminating 'Favorite Review'

#11
post #10
post #9

Still no way to request a manual review though. I already see several good detailed reviews by people that I know personally that have been flagged. As well as reviews filtered for businesses that I know personally and know for a fact that they don't pay anyone for reviews. From initial appearance, looks like a lot of innocent reviews get caught in the filter.

I looked around at some of the filtered reviews for restaurants I frequent. For the vast majority I couldn't find anything wrong with them other than that they were penned by users with less than 5-10 reviews. I can understand why they don't offer any sort of manual review -- how is a staffer who has never patronized that business capable of determining if a review is spam or legit? I wonder if it would be any better…

Well, the other weird thing that I see is that the reviews that have been filtered, are overwhelmingly highly positive. Which leads me to think that while their spam filter is agressive in filtering positive reviews, it is still vulnerable to businesses posting negative reviews about each other. Maybe that's just my limited sample size though.

Re: Yelp Increasing Transparency and Eliminating 'Favorite Review'

#12
This actually doesn't seem to address the rumors floating around about Yelp, which were that they would use (misleading) negative reviews as part of high-pressure sales tactics for small businesses. The "favorite review" feature is what Yelp themselves said they were selling. It wasn't the nexus of the accusations against them.

Re: Yelp Increasing Transparency and Eliminating 'Favorite Review'

#13
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I looked around at some of the filtered reviews for restaurants I frequent. For the vast majority I couldn't find anything wrong with them other than that they were penned by users with less than 5-10 reviews. I can understand why they don't offer any sort of manual review -- how is a staffer who has never patronized that business capable of determining if a review is spam or legit? I wonder if it would be any better…

Well, the other weird thing that I see is that the reviews that have been filtered, are overwhelmingly highly positive. Which leads me to think that while their spam filter is agressive in filtering positive reviews, it is still vulnerable to businesses posting negative reviews about each other. Maybe that's just my limited sample size though.

I did come across a number of negative reviews by users who had limited activity on the site. I guess this is an effort to block "hit-and-run" negative reviews.

The downside to filtering out reviews by "less-established" users is that you run a risk of angering new users who take the time to contribute a review to the site only to find it doesn't appear. Are they really going to bother posting a second, third, or fourth review that will also get filtered out, or will they just walk away?

Post reply on HN