Here's my take. When I was a kid, yes I had the Apple II, I had HeathKit radio kits, etc. And yes we now have iPhone, iPad, etc. But folks those all have SDK's. And Linux exists now. Arduino. Mindstorms. Roomba. All kinds of electronic and computer kits for experimentation. Make magazine. Mainstream bookstores now actually have lots of geeky computer magazines and books on the shelves. And the Internet: tons of free…
Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
31–40 of 47 posts
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I loved Gorillas. But Windows ships with .NET, including a C# and VB.Net compiler. I'd rather have hacked on that than BASIC, nostalgia value notwithstanding.
Now yes - as I much prefer Ruby, C++ and a wee bit of Haskell these days. But to learn? Absolutely not. The beauty of BASIC was that everything was simple enough that a 10 year old kid could comprehend it: type in instructions, and run them. No compilers, no CLR, no API calls. All of those things make the barrier to entry too high. I started out writing things like: 10 PRINT "Jason" 20 GOTO 10 The reason why that's s…
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#33Here's my take. When I was a kid, yes I had the Apple II, I had HeathKit radio kits, etc. And yes we now have iPhone, iPad, etc. But folks those all have SDK's. And Linux exists now. Arduino. Mindstorms. Roomba. All kinds of electronic and computer kits for experimentation. Make magazine. Mainstream bookstores now actually have lots of geeky computer magazines and books on the shelves. And the Internet: tons of free…
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#34Actually, it might give students a real incentive to tinker: "hey, you might make thousands of dollars on the App Store". Parents? Spend $100 for a curious kid's birthday to get a dev kit, it would be a great investment. Especially if it takes away from time they'd spend doing passive things like watching TV.
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#35No - because they are expensive. It's like claiming that Mercedes is destroying the hot-rod industry because kids can't get the engine management codes. Macs were never for hackers now iApple isn't - so what?
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#36"Apple is watering down computing" has been the principle argument governing the PC v. Mac holy war since the Macintosh made its debut. Nothing has changed.
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#37No - because they are expensive. It's like claiming that Mercedes is destroying the hot-rod industry because kids can't get the engine management codes. Macs were never for hackers now iApple isn't - so what?
ooo... them's fightin' words :)
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#38This article seems to pursue an odd dichotomy, that the platform can either be openable or slick - never both.
Surely those two aren't completely mutually exclusive.
Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#39Re: Is Apple destroying a generation of tech whizzes?
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I loved Gorillas. But Windows ships with .NET, including a C# and VB.Net compiler. I'd rather have hacked on that than BASIC, nostalgia value notwithstanding.
Now yes - as I much prefer Ruby, C++ and a wee bit of Haskell these days. But to learn? Absolutely not. The beauty of BASIC was that everything was simple enough that a 10 year old kid could comprehend it: type in instructions, and run them. No compilers, no CLR, no API calls. All of those things make the barrier to entry too high. I started out writing things like: 10 PRINT "Jason" 20 GOTO 10 The reason why that's s…
I don't think something like Processing is any harder to get into than basic was. I started programming with GW-BASIC, LOGO and QBasic myself - the first thing that I thought when I started playing around with Processing is that it is remarkably similar to a modern QBasic.