Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a pretty bullshit generalisation about Russians. Or as it's. More colloquially known, racist.
My words are true. Our (russians) colloquial lexicon have tremendous amount of words from thieves jargon. Constitution in Russia have less meaning than thieves' laws. Our users, even programmers/hackers are trying to get free any software - it's kind of snobbery to use paid software in Russia. Maybe it's something wild for you, but it's reality in Russia.
Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
21–30 of 125 posts
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
"How dare you show your project when it has flaws!"
"How dare you comment on the flaws found in someone's project!" If issues are never brought to light then it's very unlikely they will ever be fixed. Would you rather everyone just stayed silent? I have great respect for someone that can put in the time and effort to reverse engineer Skype, and brave Microsoft's legal team in doing so, but in its current state this code can't be used safely and is far from easy to un…
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#23I haven't spent much time browsing through the source but the code quality and security is pretty dismal so far. Not to mention the confusing project structure. Magic numbers, ... and strings, all over the place [0]. Memory leak galore (debug code?) [1]. Probably buffer overflows all over the place, here's one I noticed [2]. I suspect others given the proliferation of opaque pointers and memcpy usage. [0] https://git…
But I agree that it would be dangerous to use now. And the author isn't a skilled VCS user or open source dev either. (comments say all rights reserved)
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
My words are true. Our (russians) colloquial lexicon have tremendous amount of words from thieves jargon. Constitution in Russia have less meaning than thieves' laws. Our users, even programmers/hackers are trying to get free any software - it's kind of snobbery to use paid software in Russia. Maybe it's something wild for you, but it's reality in Russia.
I don't get your point. Why generalize over 140M people with your assumptions about illegal software usage and "thieve laws" in Russia in the topic about reverse engineering the Skype client? How does it even relate to Russia?
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#25> No. Not clean room, not chinese wall.
If it's not clean room, then there's probably copyright violations. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
Also, offering commercial licensing? That's a good way to get a lot worse than just a DMCA takedown.
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#26"Commercial license also avaiable (sic) on request." Seriously?
I see absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to profit from this. You're not being forced to use a commercial license, and the LGPL is adequate for most open source use cases.
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a pretty bullshit generalisation about Russians. Or as it's. More colloquially known, racist.
My words are true. Our (russians) colloquial lexicon have tremendous amount of words from thieves jargon. Constitution in Russia have less meaning than thieves' laws. Our users, even programmers/hackers are trying to get free any software - it's kind of snobbery to use paid software in Russia. Maybe it's something wild for you, but it's reality in Russia.
Perhaps there's a big percentage of people who feel the same, but there are also many people who pay for software:
http://www.pcgamer.com/gabe-newell-on-piracy-and-steams-succ...
Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#28Re: Skypeopensource2 – Skype client based on reversing Skype 5.5
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to profit from this. You're not being forced to use a commercial license, and the LGPL is adequate for most open source use cases.
Reversing in the first place is almost certainly illegal if you were to check the Skype ToS. Making a profit off it is just asking for trouble. I could be wrong though.
(Side note: That any kind of reversing is illegal anywhere at all is by itself a testament of the sad state most legislatures are in.)