'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#2Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#3Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#4Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#5Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#61. The two apps were probably reviewed by different people, and approvals from Apple have always been all over the place depending on the reviewer.
"The independent developers said getting approved with Google took less than one hour, while Apple’s denial came after an eight-hour wait."
2. 8 hour wait? Wow. I remember when the App Store had an 8 day review time. Let's keep in mind that Google rarely has a human review it's App submissions, Apple has a human review all of theirs, including updates.
In any case, the second half of this article is a Clinton hit piece, dropping all mention of apps and app stores and recounting again the Clinton emails story and focusing on negative reactions to it.
This was flagged and dead and should be again.
Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#7strange. This post was flagged and even showed up dead just a few mins ago. Did the mods restore this ?
Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#8It has 43 upvotes in 41 minutes. For a rather bland subject, that's not half bad (point wise), potentially motivated by the political conflict involved, but that happens.
However, in the time I've queued it in my "morning reading", I've refreshed it quite a few times and watched it flag, unflag, flag, unflag at least 5-6 rotations as I've tried to post this comment. I'm legitimately curious as to why there's so much distaste for this with so little discussion. There is certainly very little evidence to the claim of the article, and that could be called out as HN has an excellent (I mean this honestly, comments are very quick to say "this article has no substance, here is why" and I see that as a plus) history of, but the overall question of the potential for political censorship through the increasingly few gatekeepers of walled garden web content does raise some meta questions I've seen HN discuss on many other occasions with far less prompting.
I guess I'm asking two things. 1. Although there is not much empiricism in the article, is there not a meaningful discussion to be had about the above; and 2. I'm curious as to what would incite people to want to flag so hard rather than let a thread get some immediate momentum and then die off from lack of content as it is like to. (It's not even as with the snowden releases where the entire front page was snowden for a good few weeks :) )
Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#9PS - Also noticed this was flagged & removed, then restored. Very glad to see it was restored as this is a very relevant thing to be talking about in the current political climate.
Re: 'Hide It Hillary' mobile game banned by Apple, title like 'Punch Trump' approved
#10Anyone that knows anything about the Apple App Store knows this piece is a little uninformed. 1. The two apps were probably reviewed by different people, and approvals from Apple have always been all over the place depending on the reviewer. "The independent developers said getting approved with Google took less than one hour, while Apple’s denial came after an eight-hour wait." 2. 8 hour wait? Wow. I remember when t…
Strange. It almost sounds like you're afraid of this article for some reason?
And I'm saying that as someone who abhors Trump and is trying to get everyone I know to vote for Hillary. I just hate double standards is all.