Quite an interesting article!
I had two research projects on finding low quality - deleted and closed - questions on Stack Overflow [0, 1]. Since, these question classes always suffered from imbalanced class problems (2% closed and 8% deleted) - I decoded to under sampling of the majority class. Later, I used an ensemble - Gradient Decision Boosting Tree, Random Forrest - for classification. However, rather than taking bootstrap samples - I took various random samples from the majority class (equivalent to the minority class) and built many ensemble classifiers for each random sample. In the end, I checked the variation on the final classification results. It just seemed intuitive to me. I had no idea about Wallace et al.!
[0] Denzil Correa and Ashish Sureka. 2014. Chaff from the wheat: characterization and modeling of deleted questions on stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web (WWW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 631-642. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568036
[1] Denzil Correa and Ashish Sureka. 2013. Fit or unfit: analysis and prediction of 'closed questions' on stack overflow. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online social networks (COSN '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201-212. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2512938.2512954