Live data from Hacker News

New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

npr.org

91–100 of 135 posts

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#91

Why if instead of spending money researching the diseases that mosquitos could transmit to humans on the future we spend all that money into figuring out a way to exterminate all mosquitos from the surface of earth once and for all? As someone who lives on a tropical country and had have both Dengue and Chikungunya I can attest mosquitos are pure evil, and there are several researchs suggesting they serve no purpose…

This isn't on topic

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#92

Why if instead of spending money researching the diseases that mosquitos could transmit to humans on the future we spend all that money into figuring out a way to exterminate all mosquitos from the surface of earth once and for all? As someone who lives on a tropical country and had have both Dengue and Chikungunya I can attest mosquitos are pure evil, and there are several researchs suggesting they serve no purpose…

Mosquitos aren't evil. Don't assign morality to amoral creatures.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#93
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Surprisingly, sci-news.com has a better writeup on this than NPR Are sci-news's usual writeups bad ? Why is it surprising ? Other from sci-news seemed fine to me .

It's more that NPR's write-ups are usually quite good.

Seems like whenever NPR reports on subjects I happen to know really really well I find myself disappointed. Makes me wonder about the rest of their reporting.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#94
post #49

Why if instead of spending money researching the diseases that mosquitos could transmit to humans on the future we spend all that money into figuring out a way to exterminate all mosquitos from the surface of earth once and for all? As someone who lives on a tropical country and had have both Dengue and Chikungunya I can attest mosquitos are pure evil, and there are several researchs suggesting they serve no purpose…

You don't even need to wipe out all mosquitoes - just a few species (something like 6 out of 300) account for the vast majority of disease transmitted.

Agreed. Mosquitoes are important pollinators and necessary members of our food chain, we would be hurting without their help. Only reproducing females require a blood meal, further complicating the issue.

To that end, check out this [0] anti-mosquito laser weapon, which they claim can be tuned to target only females based on wing beat frequencies. While I disagree with the principal, a laser mosquito defense system gets cool points from me for creativity.

[0] http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/laser-...

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#95
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Although I remember reading somewhere that mosquitos have a negative footprint on ecology. There's definitely a ton of research at the moment on mosquito control. There was another article on HN a few years ago on a device that tracks and kills mosquitos w/ tiny lasers that can't harm humans. Apologize for lack of source, I'll try and dig them up. EDIT: found it! wasn't too hard to find haha. And it seems other repli…

What does "negative footprint" mean?

As in the do more harm than good to the ecosystem.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#96
post #92

Why if instead of spending money researching the diseases that mosquitos could transmit to humans on the future we spend all that money into figuring out a way to exterminate all mosquitos from the surface of earth once and for all? As someone who lives on a tropical country and had have both Dengue and Chikungunya I can attest mosquitos are pure evil, and there are several researchs suggesting they serve no purpose…

Mosquitos aren't evil. Don't assign morality to amoral creatures.

If we had a sound theory of what morality is and where it comes from, then we could judge the truth of of your first sentence.

As it is, I will suspend judgment on the moral status of the little bloodsuckers.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#97
post #64
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Although I remember reading somewhere that mosquitos have a negative footprint on ecology. There's definitely a ton of research at the moment on mosquito control. There was another article on HN a few years ago on a device that tracks and kills mosquitos w/ tiny lasers that can't harm humans. Apologize for lack of source, I'll try and dig them up. EDIT: found it! wasn't too hard to find haha. And it seems other repli…

Sadly the mosquito laser is not happening yet.

But a man can dream. It would be so nice to mount one on my shoulder as I travel through Southeast Asia

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does anyone actually make the conscious decision to avoid curing diseases because of its limited profitability?

Doubtful one person, but a board of directors choosing where to maintain, increase, or reduce investment does. And their legal fiduciary duty is to maximize profits. That is the system's design right there.

"their legal fiduciary duty is to maximize profits" actually is not true. Although it's of course a very common motive.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#99
In rather abstract evolution mechanics, this isn't much different from requiring male and female counterparts to procreate. All that happens here is that smaller entities are a better fit for the environment, while only a combination of them stores the full information required for another entity to be created. In simulations this has been seen quite often.

Re: New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection

#100

Why if instead of spending money researching the diseases that mosquitos could transmit to humans on the future we spend all that money into figuring out a way to exterminate all mosquitos from the surface of earth once and for all? As someone who lives on a tropical country and had have both Dengue and Chikungunya I can attest mosquitos are pure evil, and there are several researchs suggesting they serve no purpose…

Yes, after the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, we need a War on Mosquitoes. It'd be a much better allocation than the other wars and much more beneficial for humanity. I can already picture the SWAT teams running with their electrical mosquito swatters :-)

Yeah... SWAT tems aren't good enough to combat this pest, we need genetically modified biological weapons:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/05/florida-geneti...

Post reply on HN