Live data from Hacker News

How Startup Options and Ownership Work

a16z.com

31–40 of 100 posts

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#31
post #25
post #5

The article goes over stock options; but it doesn't address an alternate form of equity; issuing early employees restricted stock awards (instead of options). From the receiver's point of view, Stock Options are a bad deal 99 times out of 100, let's review the cases in which owners of options get screwed: - Company gets acquired, new terms are put into place. - Company gets acquired, company isn't good fit. - Company…

Almost all your points apply exactly equally to restricted stock as it does to options. In both cases you will have a vesting schedule, just in the case of restricted stock it's usually a grant of the shares with no exercise price. In both cases you want to file an 83(b) election so you are taxed based on the FMV of the company when you receive the unvested shares (when the shares are worthless) so that you will only…

> In both cases you want to file an 83(b) election so you are taxed based on the FMV of the company when you receive the unvested shares

Can you do this, though? 83b election with ISOs makes sense because the tax event is employee writing a check to pre-exercise his shares, so a transaction occurs. For RSUs the transaction seems to occur at the time of the actual grant - there's no money changing hands, no transaction on record, and hence no tax event.

Not a tax lawyer, just trying to understand the complexity that I thought I had under control.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have any examples of these products?

yeah, cash money. if a startup has VC's and lawyers sitting around dreaming up and codifying a complicated and rather arbitrary set of rules to protect their investment from the little people, there's enough cash floating around to pay the employees a fair salary, they just don't want to. options are fool's gold, plain and simple. you are either a founder, or a venture capitalist, or lawyer, or you should expect a ze…

>>> There are plenty of financial products possible that will tread the line of compensating employees for their risk and the lack of money and liquidity startups have

>> Do you have any examples of these products?

> yeah, cash money.

Sorry, I don't follow. The standard term sheets available today can reduce the cost of issuing options or RSUs to a few thousand dollars. It's actually a very straightforward and simple process to get stared, and has to be done anyway to at least get shares into the Founder's hands on Day 1. So, yes, there are startup legal expenses, but you are paying it no matter what, adding an option pool up front does not really cost any extra.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#34
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Almost all your points apply exactly equally to restricted stock as it does to options. In both cases you will have a vesting schedule, just in the case of restricted stock it's usually a grant of the shares with no exercise price. In both cases you want to file an 83(b) election so you are taxed based on the FMV of the company when you receive the unvested shares (when the shares are worthless) so that you will only…

> In both cases you want to file an 83(b) election so you are taxed based on the FMV of the company when you receive the unvested shares Can you do this, though? 83b election with ISOs makes sense because the tax event is employee writing a check to pre-exercise his shares, so a transaction occurs. For RSUs the transaction seems to occur at the time of the actual grant - there's no money changing hands, no transactio…

Great point! From http://www.investopedia.com/articles/tax/09/restricted-stock...

  Section 83(b) Election
  Shareholders of restricted stock are allowed to report the fair market value
  of their shares as ordinary income on the date that they are granted, instead
  of when they become vested, if they so desire. This election can greatly reduce
  the amount of taxes that are paid upon the plan, because the stock price at the
  time of grant is often much lower than at the time of vesting. Therefore, capital
  gains treatment begins at the time of grant and not at vesting. This type of election
  can be especially useful when longer periods of time exist between when shares are
  granted and when they vest (five years or more).

  Taxation of RSUs
  The taxation of RSUs is a bit simpler than for standard restricted stock plans.
  Because there is no actual stock issued at grant, no Section 83(b) election is
  permitted. This means that there is only one date in the life of the plan on which
  the value of the stock can be declared. The amount reported will equal the fair market
  value of the stock on the date of vesting, which is also the date of delivery in this
  case. Therefore, the value of the stock is reported as ordinary income in the year the
  stock becomes vested.
To me that means that Founders shares would be in the form of restricted stock, however RSUs would only be appropriate for liquid (publicly traded) shares.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#35

I am curious to know when is the best time to ask all the questions about the stock options. Before signing the offer letter / getting started or after? Before may be a bad deal for startups, especially the ones that are keeping everything all the equity details under wraps. After is a bad deal for the employee who makes the move, and could be a major bait and switch

If you don't know (minimally) the fully diluted count of shares in the company, your option grant is as specific is saying that your salary will be denominated in dollars and you'll be given more detail about it sometime after joining the company, pinky-swear.

A company which won't provide enough information to value an option grant contemporaneous with the written offer is being either abusive or stupid. There exist employment opportunities at companies which are neither abusive nor stupid. Take one of those instead.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#36
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most restricted stock subject to vesting will require the recipient to file an 83(b) election. This takes the full current value of all shares at the current issue price as income up front. Since the shares are typically worthless at that point, the tax bill is zero. The alternative is disastrous for a fast growing company. Each month, each year, you are vesting new shares at an exponentially increasing valuation, an…

> Most restricted stock subject to vesting will require the recipient to file an 83(b) election No RSU grant "requires" an 83(b) election. Your second point is why RSU grants with normal vesting and delayed release is desirable.

I've personally written restricted stock grants which require 83(b) elections to be filed. My understanding is that is boilerplate in the Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement.

Please note, Restricted Stock !== RSU, and RSUs are not eligible for 83(b) because they are just a promise of future shares, no stock is actually issued until the conditions are met. (see above)

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#37
post #17
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Considering the author's previous article was about how employees do not deserve to keep their equity unless they stay with a company until liquidity, I suspect he would not support granting restricted stock. http://a16z.com/2016/07/26/options-plan/

If they didn't deserve it, then they shouldn't be compensating the employees with equity & should be doing so with cash. Can't have it both ways. (This is more of a response to the link, not your comment in particular)

  > Can't have it both ways.
See the "participating" section of the article on preference, where the investor can in fact have it both ways.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#39
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, having it both ways is entirely dependent on market forces. As of right now, it would seem they can in fact have it both ways.

always depends what employees are willing to do.

Which is what Parent meant by market forces.

Re: How Startup Options and Ownership Work

#40
post #5

The article goes over stock options; but it doesn't address an alternate form of equity; issuing early employees restricted stock awards (instead of options). From the receiver's point of view, Stock Options are a bad deal 99 times out of 100, let's review the cases in which owners of options get screwed: - Company gets acquired, new terms are put into place. - Company gets acquired, company isn't good fit. - Company…

Are there any companies you know that use RSU's or stock grants instead of options? I've been interviewing at some startups and they only seem to offer options with their byzantine rules. Can people negotiate offers from options to RSUs/grants?

If you're joining a company very early (first 10 employees) you should probably be getting stock (not options). It's possible to do that and is a sign of an employee-friendly founder. Plus, at an early stage you can do an 83(b) on the stock itself and have a much more favorable tax situation.

I have successfully negotiated for founder stock instead of options in the past, so it's something you can definitely do.

Post reply on HN