Dinosaur and Lisp
11–20 of 97 posts
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#12Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#13Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
> I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects Would Autocad qualify?
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#14Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#15Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#16Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#17Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#18Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
Mezzano? https://github.com/froggey/Mezzano
BTW, I'm strongly against the idea of creating new OS's just because we _can_. By end-user app, I mean something along the lines of a browser, fully capable back/front-end framework, essential industrial software, etc.
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#19 (defun x-find-color (rgba &key (x 0) (y 0)
(width default-width) (height default-height)
(test #'equal)
(snap-data (x-snapshot :x x :y y :width width :height height)))
...)
Also if not using asdf, the quickload form should be wrapped in an eval-when. It will fail If I Try to compile the file (C-c C-k) on a fresh session.This are nitpicks, the code is understandable and easy to read. Nice writeup and cool idea!
[0]: https://github.com/VitoVan/cl-dino/blob/master/cl-autogui.li... [1]: https://github.com/slburson/misc-extensions
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects Would Autocad qualify?
No. AutoCAD is written in C++. It has a crude Lisp as an extension language, but that has been deprecated years ago in favor of VBA and loadable C++ DLLs.
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=...
and their Lisp forum looks busy:
http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/visual-lisp-autolisp-and-gener...