Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pro tip: click the "web" link below the article title. It will take you to a Google search for the article, whose link circumvents the paywall.
It doesn't work for me, link in result still paywalled.
4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
31–40 of 229 posts
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#32Wow, remind me not to hire you for a job then. As an employer I am paying you to put my work ahead of yours. I am paying you to be productive so that with the collective production of the employees, the company can outmaneuver the competition. This lackadaisical approach and work-ethic means that, of course the mile high task list will always be there. It'll never ever get done!
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience, most do. In Japan it's even common to expect an employee to move in a weeks notice for up to a year at a time.
Keep in mind I said "worthwhile". :) I wouldn't tell anyone how to value their time, but I certainly wouldn't tolerate an employer telling me what I could focus on during off-hours.
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#34Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you believe you are hiring him for that reason, then I see why you felt the need to use a throwaway. You're buying his time and experience for agreed upon hours. You don't have the ability to make him put your work ahead of his anymore than you have the ability to make him put your work ahead of his family, personal life, education or retirement savings. In discussions like this I tend to fall on sympathizing with…
Of course, you're forgetting the most important part! People get paid for all sorts of reasons. If you are being paid specifically to put work in front of your hobbies, then that is your job! Think database uptime employees who are paid to get up in the middle of the night to fix a bug, etc. Heck, I even paid a friend to eat a shoe once; you can pay people to do all sorts of things. Paying someone to put work in fron…
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Keep in mind I said "worthwhile". :) I wouldn't tell anyone how to value their time, but I certainly wouldn't tolerate an employer telling me what I could focus on during off-hours.
Well it's certainly worthwhile to the Japanese people that work at these jobs for decades. Otherwise they would not continue to do it.
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#37http://flowingdata.com/2015/12/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-ameri...
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#38I'm one of those unlucky types that have the hardest time waking up and getting going in the morning. Mentally I'm at 50% or less. Is there anyone else like this who's found techniques or other methods of overcoming the slow start?
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#39This was obviously written by a "morning person." Like most engineers and other creatives, 4 AM is when I'm just starting to get my deep sleep (which peaks at 6-7 AM). 12-2 AM is the most productive time of the day for me.
As a normally decidedly non-morning person, getting up really early (2-4am) works surprisingly well for me. Allows for a really slow, but stress-free morning, which leads to a more productive rest of the day. The hardest part (for me) is realizing that yes, I have done enough and am tired, and should not power through an evening-low and stay up until after midnight. YMMV of course, but getting up really early might n…
Waking up at 4AM would mean that time-frame moves up another 3 hours and I would have to finish doing everything I need to during the day by 2-3PM and most jobs would generally look down upon that.
> YMMV of course, but getting up really early might not be as outlandish as it sounds.
Doing it once or twice isn't especially difficult or outlandish, but I haven't managed to keep it up longer than a week despite my best efforts. And it always resulted in absolutely miserable afternoons.
Re: 4 a.m. Is the Most Productive Hour
#40Wow, remind me not to hire you for a job then. As an employer I am paying you to put my work ahead of yours. I am paying you to be productive so that with the collective production of the employees, the company can outmaneuver the competition. This lackadaisical approach and work-ethic means that, of course the mile high task list will always be there. It'll never ever get done!
If you believe you are hiring him for that reason, then I see why you felt the need to use a throwaway. You're buying his time and experience for agreed upon hours. You don't have the ability to make him put your work ahead of his anymore than you have the ability to make him put your work ahead of his family, personal life, education or retirement savings. In discussions like this I tend to fall on sympathizing with…