A tiny question: does this mean a workflow in which only one user would be able to merge a specific branch (say: master) is only available in the enterprise edition? I imagine this is quite a common workflow, even at smaller companies or non-profits. This essentially forces you to use an entire repo per user to do code review, even though oftentimes you wouldn't need this when you can restrict branch access to a spec…
GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
41–50 of 128 posts
Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#42Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#43I've recently moved to pushing all my open source code to both GitLab and GitHub, but using GitLab for actual issue tracking, continuous integration, build tests, etc. I've found GitLab's integrated toolset to be superior to what GitHub currently offers, and in truth there isn't really anything I feel like I've been missing (some tools like Code Climate are only free for GitHub accounts, but it's easily resolved by j…
> some tools like Code Climate are only free for GitHub accounts, but it's easily resolved by just using both Are you doing a read only mirror to GitHub for this?
Code Climate can still happily read from the GitHub project and I can add the badge to the README if desired, which is visible on both GitLab and GitHub.
And since origin pushes to both, they are rarely if ever out of sync.
And by using GitLab I get GitLab CI instead of Travis (which is quite nice), GitLab's amazing Issue tracker and board, which blows GitHub away, more fine grained control over merging (no more forced --no-ff merges if you don't want), Issue and MR templates, an activity stream, far more control over your project's settings... really I can't say enough good things about my experience with GitLab over the last ~6 months.
Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#44Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since using Asana, one feature I want in every project management / issue management tool is the @mention [0]. Asana's @mention allows you to link other tasks or issues very conveniently. Just like HipChat's commands feature mentioned in your release notes, Asana's @mention feature is extremely convenient. [0]: https://asana.com/guide/help/fundamentals/text
In GitLab you can use @ to mention people, # to mention issues, and ! to mention merge requests.
Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
> some tools like Code Climate are only free for GitHub accounts, but it's easily resolved by just using both Are you doing a read only mirror to GitHub for this?
Effectively. My project still gets pushed to GitHub and lives there, but I've disabled every feature I could (you can't disable PRs, but it's easy enough to redirect PRs over to GitLab). Code Climate can still happily read from the GitHub project and I can add the badge to the README if desired, which is visible on both GitLab and GitHub. And since origin pushes to both, they are rarely if ever out of sync. And by us…
Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#47I have yet to understand where this kanban board stuff makes sense. Apparently, the Agile philosophy [0] introduced this to the software development world. Most implementations (Gitlab, Wekan) seem to miss central features (limits, cycle time stats). I guess those boards serve as a issue tracker extension for short term development? How does that improve the process? Why do you need that on top of an issue tracker? R…
Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#48Re: GitLab 8.11 Released with Issue Boards and Merge Conflict Resolution
#49Question: I would like to migrate from Github to Gitlab, but can not really move. Is there some bridge, which would mirror Github repos (with Issue tracker and pull requests) on Gitlab?