Live data from Hacker News

An act to amend Financial and Corporations Codes relating to digital currency

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

1–10 of 61 posts

Re: An act to amend Financial and Corporations Codes relating to digital currency

#2
Can imagine this will be impossible to force with the rise of decentralized exchanges for BTC and ETH like Bitsquare and EtherEx. But still...

"The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the digital currency business without enrolling in the program and would prohibit the conduct of digital currency business through an unenrolled agent. The bill would require a person seeking enrollment to pay a nonrefundable fee of up to $5,000... The bill would also require the person to provide fingerprints and would authorize the commissioner to deliver the fingerprints to law enforcement agencies."

Fuck this.

Re: An act to amend Financial and Corporations Codes relating to digital currency

#3
So what constitutes a digital currency? I mean, I've heard arguments that BTC is really an asset being traded. Didn't see that

Also: looks like proposed fee has been increased to $5000 from $500 (didn't look for other details).

Amusing that legalese is essentially similar to code, but without variable declarations (ie, $digitalcurrency := "currency that's traded online, including but not restricted to BTC, etc") it's a bit of a nightmare to parse.

Re: An act to amend Financial and Corporations Codes relating to digital currency

#7

Can imagine this will be impossible to force with the rise of decentralized exchanges for BTC and ETH like Bitsquare and EtherEx. But still... "The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the digital currency business without enrolling in the program and would prohibit the conduct of digital currency business through an unenrolled agent. The bill would require a person seeking enrollment to pay a nonrefundable…

Truly fuck this law. Not even sure how they are going to enforce this rubbish.
Post reply on HN