Show HN: 1M rows/s from Postgres to Python

Post by infinite8s » Fri, Aug 05, 2016, 2:25 PM UTC

allendoerfer wrote: post #67

zzzeek wrote: post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's possible to make a really nice async sqlalchemy core too, and even some of the ORM. huge amount of work, i started on just the connection pool. Would be nice but require all its own test coverage and everything. If i was the CEO of sqlalchemy inc, it would have been done. But that's not where my salary comes from :)

SQLAlchemy is clearly one of the best ORMs (maybe there is something in Java-land that I don't know). It is beyond me how you are not guilted by cash getting thrown in your direction into making this your job. Well, I like what bountysource.com and others are doing, maybe we will get there.

Post by sametmax » Sun, Aug 07, 2016, 5:44 PM UTC

1st1 wrote: post #90

sametmax wrote: post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The tone used is indeed not the proper one, but while I'm a big asyncio advocate, I think it would be beneficial if you would split your project in 2, separating the IO from the rest (like hyper does https://github.com/Lukasa/hyper ). The rational being: - Python is not just async. It currently majoritarly sync. A lot of the community would benefit from your awesome project; - You'd have contrib from the async and sy…

> I think it would be beneficial if you would split your project in 2, separating the IO from the rest (like hyper does https://github.com/Lukasa/hyper ). I'd like to do that, but we don't have resources. If we had a couple capable devs volunteering on the GH to do this, I'd be glad to review patches and guide the development.