Does the sale mean F# is having its WhatsApp (Erlang) moment, in other words major industry validation?
well, I didn't know whatsapp uses erlang until now and I think it didn't really help make erlang more popular for me I believe it was couchdb that brought erlang to light .. but now it seems erlang isn't really getting any more popular but yea, of course being used by whatsapp is very strong validation for erlang
Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
111–120 of 196 posts
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#112Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Walmart has already spent close to $12B funding walmart.com/labs and not made a dent in catching Amazon. Jet has a super smart team looking at ways to gain margins in areas amazon is ignoring. short term their investors won't appreciate this buy.
> Jet has a super smart team They might be smart but they haven't been successful. They almost immediately abandoned their original value proposition-- make money on the subscriptions like Costco and break even on sales.
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really, you are claiming that if a company raised $570M and sold for $3B, the common shareholders will get screwed? Do you have some information we don't? The publicly reported valuation at the last funding round was $1.4B. Those would have to be some impossibly harsh terms to not leave well over $1B to the common shareholders.
> "Those would have to be some impossibly harsh terms" Harsh terms yes, but not uncommon. Preferred shares are common for investors that pay out at a multiple of the common shares, so in an exit the preferred pool can be paid at a dramatically higher rate than common shares. Funding often also comes with guarantees on return - i.e., if the exit price is below a threshold, the investor gets a guaranteed minimum return…
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Jet has a super smart team They might be smart but they haven't been successful. They almost immediately abandoned their original value proposition-- make money on the subscriptions like Costco and break even on sales.
If pivoting means you're not smart, HN would be the stupidest place on the internet.
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#116While this is a definite failure for Jet's optimistic investors, it's likely a great opportunity for Wal-Mart to challenge Amazon, and a win for consumers. It's also a big win for OCaml. I tried shopping at Jet and while some of the prices were very good, others were worse than Amazon, and little things like product detail information, pictures, etc., were strongly subpar. Product search was also in serious need of t…
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#117Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#118All of these companies (Walmart, Bestbuy etc) are trying to compete with Amazon by offering things like price match etc. Sure it is nice to have a price match from Bestbuy and pick up your product on the same day from Bestbuy. But Amazon came back with a KO punch and offered Same-Day/One-Day shipping. I can basically order it before midnight of the previous day and have it at my doors by max 7pm the next day. Amazon has successfully created a concept of brand among household consumers. They are the Apple of household consumerism and most people don't want to buy from uncool brands. When I search for a product on Google shopping and if the price is same on Amazon and Walmart, I would pick Amazon because of "PRIME" shipping. Even if it is $1 cheaper on Walamrt I would still go for Amazon. Brand loyalty can't be bought with $3B. Brand loyalty needs to be created at grass root level.
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Walmart has already spent close to $12B funding walmart.com/labs and not made a dent in catching Amazon. Jet has a super smart team looking at ways to gain margins in areas amazon is ignoring. short term their investors won't appreciate this buy.
> Jet has a super smart team looking at ways to gain margins in areas amazon is ignoring So does Walmart Labs, though. What makes Jet a better buy? Even if they've proven successful as their own company I'm super-skeptical of any startup merging with a larger organisation and retaining anywhere near 100% efficiency.
Re: Wal-Mart in Talks to Buy Web Retailer Jet.com for $3B
#120Before everyone gets up in a big frenzy on the price, read the article (closely):
"It isn’t clear how much Wal-Mart would pay, but a person familiar with the matter said Jet could be valued at up to $3 billion in private markets."
That is nowhere near a statement that $3B is number from Wal-Mart. That means "someone" thinks they COULD be valued at UP TO $3B in "private markets". That "someone" could be Jet's CEO. Or their banker.
Wal-Mart isn't dumb. In fact, they're the opposite of dumb when it comes to paying for things. They wouldn't pay $3B for a failed ecommerce startup if they can let it fail and buy the assets or pay much, much less in various other scenarios.
I doubt we'll see this deal go for anywhere close to $3B, if it happens at all. This is likely a negotaition tactic to drum up interest (and/or the price) from other potential acquirers.